2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2016.7511101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards reduced reference parametric models for estimating audiovisual quality in multimedia services

Abstract: Abstract-We have developed reduced reference parametric models for estimating perceived quality in audiovisual multimedia services. We have created 144 unique configurations for audiovisual content including various application and network parameters such as bitrates and distortions in terms of bandwidth, packet loss rate and jitter. To generate the data needed for model training and validation we have tasked 24 subjects, in a controlled environment, to rate the overall audiovisual quality on the absolute cate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data exploration observed by Diaz-Aviles et al (2015) showed a promising correlation between the data feeds gathered from the network traffic and the registered calls to the care center, which enabled the prediction of user experience in real-time. Evidently, the restricted random forest showed 59% precision by Diaz-Aviles et al (2015), representing a fair MOS score (Demirbilek & Gregoire, 2016). The low precision observed by Diaz-Aviles et al (2015), indicated the unbalances observed in the data, because only a limited number of users would call customer care to report issues observed in the usage of the mobile Internet.…”
Section: Proposed Framework For Modelling Mobile Network Perceived Qoe Using Big Data Analytics Approachmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data exploration observed by Diaz-Aviles et al (2015) showed a promising correlation between the data feeds gathered from the network traffic and the registered calls to the care center, which enabled the prediction of user experience in real-time. Evidently, the restricted random forest showed 59% precision by Diaz-Aviles et al (2015), representing a fair MOS score (Demirbilek & Gregoire, 2016). The low precision observed by Diaz-Aviles et al (2015), indicated the unbalances observed in the data, because only a limited number of users would call customer care to report issues observed in the usage of the mobile Internet.…”
Section: Proposed Framework For Modelling Mobile Network Perceived Qoe Using Big Data Analytics Approachmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Observation of the data instances in this case represents the independent variable (that is, the extracted features from the big datasets and expectations) while the categories predicted are the possible values of dependent variables (perceived QoE) which are the classes or outcomes. The categorical outcome is usually represented as Excellent =5, Good =4, Fair =3, Poor =2, and Bad =1 (Demirbilek & Gregoire, 2016). The modelling of perceived QoE using the machine-learning algorithms would map the combination of input parameters to a class value to build an efficient model that classifies extracted features with maximum precision through the perceived QoE function described as QoE l examined the positive and negative impacts of fect as in the case of the IQX hypothesis.…”
Section: Methodological Instances Of the Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these results are compared with external perceptual responses gathered from the literature. To this end, perceptual data from VQEG-MM [19], UnB-2013 [25], INRS [44], and LIVE-NFLX-II [24] were considered for comparison. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for these datasets are reported in Table 14.…”
Section: On the Internal Consistency And External Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sixth database is the INRS [28], which contains a single 720p SRC of 45 seconds. The database con- tains 160 HRCs, consisting of video (H.264) compression bitrates and network settings (frame rate, packet loss rate, quantization, and noise reduction parameters).…”
Section: Available Audio-visual Quality Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%