Abstract-Video transmission over VANETs is an extremely difficult task not only due to the high bandwidth requirements, but also due to typical VANET characteristics such as signal attenuation, packet losses, high relative speeds and fast topology changes.In future scenarios, vehicles will provide other vehicles with information about accidents or congestion on the road, and in these cases offering visual information can be a really valuable resource for both drivers and traffic authorities. Hence, achieving an efficient transmission is critical to maximize the user-perceived quality. In this paper we evaluate solutions that combine different flooding techniques, and different video codecs to assess the effectiveness of long-distance real-time video streaming. In particular, we will compare the most effective video coding standard available (H.264) with the upcoming H.265 codec in terms of both frame loss and PSNR.Index Terms-Video streaming, V2V, VANET, flooding, h.264/AVC, h.265/HEVC I. INTRODUCTION Vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs) are receiving a lot of attention from vehicle manufacturers since they promote smarter, cleaner, and safer vehicles. In a near future it is expected that vehicular networks will be as extended as mobile phones are nowadays. Vehicles will be equipped with different sensors which can provide useful information to other drivers or traffic authorities. One of the most useful information a vehicle can provide is the live video of an accident situation, not only allowing the emergency services to know in advance the exact status of the accident, but also for other vehicles to decide whether to change their current route.VANETs provide one of the most difficult environments to achieve a good transmission quality since this type of networks involve high relative speeds, which cause short connection times and transmission problems such as the Doppler effect. In addition, bandwidth is typically very limited, thus becoming one of the worst case scenarios for real-time video transmission. With these constraints it is necessary to check whether it is possible to achieve real-time video transmission with current broadcasting techniques, and, if so, evaluate the final quality of the obtained video.The recent approval of the new H.265 video compression standard [1], which intends to replace the widely used and well-known H.264 standard [2], provides a new opportunity