2017 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ipin.2017.8115885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards real-time time-of-arrival self-calibration using ultra-wideband anchors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the approach used by the authors in Batstone et al [13], we first evaluate our self-calibration algorithm in the IIoT room with the MOCAP system and then we move the the more complex environment, i.e., the Office-Lab. We do so in order to evaluate first the performance in optimal conditions, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the approach used by the authors in Batstone et al [13], we first evaluate our self-calibration algorithm in the IIoT room with the MOCAP system and then we move the the more complex environment, i.e., the Office-Lab. We do so in order to evaluate first the performance in optimal conditions, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Batstone et al [13] experimentally evaluates the use of the Random sampling paradigm (RANSAC) and minimal solvers applied to the self-calibration enigma. The advantage of their method is that a solution can be found for a small dataset and then merged sequentially to a previous solutions, leading to computationally lighter algorithms to increase performance.…”
Section: Self-calibration For Uwb Anchor Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faster robot movements might have lead to noticeable motion blur and therefore degraded accuracy in the feature tracking of the VINS. The trajectory in experiment 1 resulted in the highest anchor pose estimation error of 11.4 cm root-meansquare error (RMSE), which is however still below anchor localization errors of 59.2 cm and 15.2 cm mentioned in [34] and [35] respectively, which are solely based on range measurements. Table III shows how the sensor error model performed across the experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…If the quantity of data is large enough, no receiver or transmitter locations are required; a set of range measurements is sufficient. Calibration can then be formulated as an optimization problem that minimizes the residual of the trilateration equations [ 7 , 8 , 26 , 27 , 29 ]. Results from these approaches are not always unique, for example, in the case of rotational symmetry.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%