2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards real Li-air batteries: A binder-free cathode with high electrochemical performance in CO2 and O2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Employing bifunctional electro-catalysts has been verified to facilitate the oxygen redox reactions for Li-air batteries in practical conditions in the absence of OSM. [126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134] After substituting Fe on some of the Mn sites in MnOx, the Mn1.8Fe0.2O3 cathode containing Li-air battery showed showed only 25% capacity loss after 10 cycles in ambient air. [127] A Pd nanolayer was reported to have been deposited in situ on Ni foam via a galvanic exchange method.…”
Section: Multifunctional Catalystmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing bifunctional electro-catalysts has been verified to facilitate the oxygen redox reactions for Li-air batteries in practical conditions in the absence of OSM. [126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134] After substituting Fe on some of the Mn sites in MnOx, the Mn1.8Fe0.2O3 cathode containing Li-air battery showed showed only 25% capacity loss after 10 cycles in ambient air. [127] A Pd nanolayer was reported to have been deposited in situ on Ni foam via a galvanic exchange method.…”
Section: Multifunctional Catalystmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Figure f compares CC@Mo 2 C NPs with some typical reported Li–CO 2 battery cathode materials in terms of various electrochemical properties. It is found that high specific capacity and low charge plateau have both been integrated into this CC@Mo 2 C NPs hybrid film and its energy efficiency outperforms that of all previous catalysts for Li–CO 2 batteries ever reported . The excellent electrochemical performance of CC@Mo 2 C NPs should be attributed to the significant advantages of this unique 0D/1D hybrid nanostructure as follows: first, 3D porous framework entangled by 1D CNTs supplies enough inner space for the deposition of discharge product, and thus opening more active sites to Li + and CO 2 gas instead of the electrode surface alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For fabricating Li–CO 2 batteries, these catalysts are inevitable to be connected with current collector (e.g., carbon paper and nickel foam) to constitute a porous gas cathode before assembly. As a result, it caused a fact that Li–CO 2 batteries have been produced in a 2D rigid bulk structure while the total mass of energy storage system has been unnecessarily enlarged as well . Such planar indeformable power accessories with heavy weight are obviously not adaptable for flexible and wearable electronics .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many efforts have been made to solve the problems by introducing cathode catalysts with both CO 2 reduction and evolution activities . Metal‐based materials showed higher activity than the initial carbon‐based ones for rechargeable Li‐CO 2 batteries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%