2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2019.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards random-honest miners selection and multi-blocks creation: Proof-of-negotiation consensus mechanism in blockchain networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A blockchain can be regarded as a digital ledger of transactions which is duplicated and distributed across the network of various supply chain parties [40,41]. With the blockchain structure of the hash of a previous block, the timestamp and the Merkle root as a proof of work, the supply chain parties involving in the transactions can record and publish their transaction records in a distributed and shared ledger in a secure and immutable way because their transaction records are hashed, timestamped and stored in a blockchain, confirming the transactions by the consensus mechanism in the blockchain network [42], imposing impossibility for hackers to reverse the blockchain's entire historical transaction records under the scrutiny of all the users (i.e., supply chain parties) who can access the distributed and shared ledger [43], articulating the decentralization without the presence of a third party (e.g., government authority, clearing house and central bank) [44,45], and providing auditability and transparency of keeping transaction records in the blockchain network [10].…”
Section: Sustainability Of Blockchains In Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A blockchain can be regarded as a digital ledger of transactions which is duplicated and distributed across the network of various supply chain parties [40,41]. With the blockchain structure of the hash of a previous block, the timestamp and the Merkle root as a proof of work, the supply chain parties involving in the transactions can record and publish their transaction records in a distributed and shared ledger in a secure and immutable way because their transaction records are hashed, timestamped and stored in a blockchain, confirming the transactions by the consensus mechanism in the blockchain network [42], imposing impossibility for hackers to reverse the blockchain's entire historical transaction records under the scrutiny of all the users (i.e., supply chain parties) who can access the distributed and shared ledger [43], articulating the decentralization without the presence of a third party (e.g., government authority, clearing house and central bank) [44,45], and providing auditability and transparency of keeping transaction records in the blockchain network [10].…”
Section: Sustainability Of Blockchains In Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The security of blockchain is guaranteed by the elimination of data tempering because the data are decentralized and distributed among the blockchain users [77], the adoption of encryption technology to prevent information theft and modification [78] and the consensus mechanism [79]. The consensus mechanism establishes trust among the blockchain users [42]. The shareability of blockchain is featured by distributing the transaction records (e.g., supply chain legal and contracting records) to all supply chain parties involved in the transactions.…”
Section: Literature About Applicability Of Blockchain In Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockchain can provide a wide range of benefits for IoT. Feng et al [28] said consensus is one of the key features of Blockchain networks. Also, the mechanism of traditional consensus algorithms mechanisms is such that it may provide opportunities for attackers to attack system denials to miners.…”
Section: Research Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other alternative consensus mechanisms such as creditbased PoW [9], proof of reputation (PoR) [27] and proof of negotiation (PoN) [6], have been also proposed in the literature. PoR studies a two-chain architecture to construct the reputation of nodes in a separate chain and the next block generator is determined by the reputation chain [27].…”
Section: Ralated Work 21 Blockchain and Consensus Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PoN, the trustworthiness of miners are evaluated and a random-honest miner is selected based on negotiation rules. The PoN investigates parallel multi-block creation method to achieve high efficiency than traditional consensus mechanisms in one-by-one block creation [6]. To date, PoW remains the most popular and widely accepted choice [7].…”
Section: Ralated Work 21 Blockchain and Consensus Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%