2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2007.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards quantitative laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis of soil samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, similarly to the papers [20][21][22][23][24], the role of laser pulse energy and plasma fluctuations was diminished by normalising the line intensity with the total intensity recorded between 220 and 850 nm. Figure 3(a) based on Table 1 shows a high correlation coefficient R 2 = 0 9846 between the mass fraction of total carbon and the heating value.…”
Section: Selection Of Spectral Linessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In the present study, similarly to the papers [20][21][22][23][24], the role of laser pulse energy and plasma fluctuations was diminished by normalising the line intensity with the total intensity recorded between 220 and 850 nm. Figure 3(a) based on Table 1 shows a high correlation coefficient R 2 = 0 9846 between the mass fraction of total carbon and the heating value.…”
Section: Selection Of Spectral Linessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Indeed, a mixture of sand containing graphite was found to absorb four times and to provide a LIBS signal for the analyte twice the value of a cellulose sand mixture [6]. In ad dition, the plasma temperature T e and the electron density N e are ideal parameters to probe the differences between the two soil sam ples due to matrix effects since they are very sensitive to the soil ma trix composition [7]. This problem of matrix effect can be usually overcome by the use of matrix matched samples for the calibration step but unfortunately, this approach can't be applied to soils because of the huge diversity of natural soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of an internal standard is not possible in the case of soil samples because there is no chemical element in the soil matrices with constant concentration or even with known different values of concentration [9,10]. Other ways of normalization have been proposed such as normalization by the whole spectrum [7] or by the acoustic signal monitored during the plasma ablation and supposed to be proportional to the ablated mass [11]. Finally, these different solutions of normalization efficient ly allow reducing the experimental fluctuations due to physical pa rameters such as laser energy, focusing conditions, or sample moisture but are not sufficient to remove matrix effects due to the chemical composition of the samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plotting a calibration curve between known concentrations against the LIBS signal intensities yields the relative composition of the respective elements [19][20][21][22]. To calculate the percentage composition of toxic and other elements present in textile dyes, we used three calibration approaches.…”
Section: Quantitative Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%