2016
DOI: 10.1364/oe.24.002971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards quantification of the crucial impact of auger recombination for the efficiency droop in (AlInGa)N quantum well structures

Abstract: Recent experimental investigations on the reduction of internal quantum efficiency with increasing current density in (AlInGa)N quantum well structures show that Auger recombination is a significant contributor to the so-called "droop" phenomenon. Using photoluminescence (PL) test structures, we find Auger processes are responsible for at least 15 % of the measured efficiency droop. Furthermore, we confirm that electron-electronhole (nnp) is stronger than electron-hole-hole (npp) Auger recombination in standar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that in addition to the radiative RC B, where (temperature-independent) calculations have shown a reduction due to random alloying, 6 also the Auger RC C should scale with the electron-hole wave function overlap. The Augur RC C, corresponding to the process involving two delocalized electrons and a localized hole -in line with the experimentally identified dominant Auger process 19,39,40 can be estimated as 41…”
Section: Eqe Maxmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…We note that in addition to the radiative RC B, where (temperature-independent) calculations have shown a reduction due to random alloying, 6 also the Auger RC C should scale with the electron-hole wave function overlap. The Augur RC C, corresponding to the process involving two delocalized electrons and a localized hole -in line with the experimentally identified dominant Auger process 19,39,40 can be estimated as 41…”
Section: Eqe Maxmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…23 Interestingly, for non-polar QWs (and, approximately, screened polar QWs), we find C eeh to be larger than C hhe by a factor of 1-14, depending on the carrier density, which agrees with a recent experimental report that C eeh is larger than C hhe by a factor of 1-12. 27 Our results therefore reveal that the interplay of QW composition, carrier localization, polarization fields, quantum confinement, carrier density, and screening plays an important role in determining the dominant Auger recombination type (eeh or hhe) in InGaN QWs. We further determine the temperature dependence of the radiative and Auger coefficients in fluctuating alloys and compare to virtual crystals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…41 Although not shown here, doping effects also affect the other (non-radiative) recombination channels. 42 Accordingly, in all the following, results will be shown for pin structures with centered QWs to avoid doping artifacts. Fig.…”
Section: Radiative Recombination-as a Preliminary To Presenting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%