Towards predicting human error: Eye gaze analysis for identification of cognitive steps performed by control room operators

Detection of Learner’s Concentration in Distance Learning System with Multiple Biological Information

“…The study conducted by Kodappully et al [28] mentioned that biological information has a correlation with brain activities. They also claimed that many fixation counts on the area of interest implies the interest on the content, while high fixation rate (fixation count per second) implies effective information processing.…”

Complete Journal

“…In the assessment of cognitive functions in the workplace, no specific neuropsychological batteries were found to be used consistently and uniformly for this purpose. on the other hand, tests and scales were found that are used to measure cognitive functions in different work environments such as aviation (Asmayawati & Nixon, 2020), military activities (Frings, 2011;Irgens-Hansen et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2019, Bell, Virden, lewis & Cassidy, 2015, conduction (Horrey, lesch & Garabet, 2009; Cheng, Ting, Liu & Ba, 2015;De Oliveira et al, 2020;Chen, Chou, Su & Wen, 2019, Di Nocera et al, 2018, Adrian, Postal, Moessinger, Rascle & Charles, 2011Elfer-ing, Grebner & Haller, 2012), construction (Brossoit et al, 2019), service sector (Roll, Siu, li & de Witte, 2019;Elfering, Grebner & de Tribolet-Hardy, 2013), industrial operators and services (Kodappully, Srinivasan & Srinivasan, 2016;Muller et al, 2012) and other activities (Buodo, Patron, Benvenuti & Palomba, 2018;Askaripoor et al, 2019;Petitta, Probst, Ghezzi & Barbaranelli, 2019;Huang, Menozzi & Favey, 2019).…”

“…The findings of this review show the limited number of investigations that relate the establishment of neuropsychological profiles associated with occupational accidents. Unified evaluations are evidenced and few establish a comprehensive profile as an object of study, some cognitive functions most evaluated in reported investigations were attention and memory (Buodo et al, 2018;Asmayawati & Nixon, 2020;Chen et al, 2019;Brossoit et al, 2019;Roll et al, 2019;Petitta et al, 2019;Askaripoor et al, 2019;Di Nocera et al, 2018;Kodappully et al, 2016;Irgens et al, 2015;Bell et al, 2015;Elfering et al, 2012;2013;Muller et al, 2012;Horrey et al, 2009) were evaluated to a lesser extent as cognitive flexibility and processing speed (Frings, 2011;Bell et al, 2015;Muller et al, 2012;Adrian et al, 2011). It is important to point out that this review seeks to gather the greatest evidence that reflects the state of research and knowledge gaps in the study of the performance of cognitive functions in occupational accidents, since accidents in the workplace affect many spheres of work-business and personal life, implying a high financial and social cost (Feng et al, 2015).…”

Soundscaping: Sound, meaning and vision in healthcare alarm systems

“…Recent research shows how examining the combination of sound and visual cues can be carefully considered to improve our understanding of interface usability and the mental models and cognitive processing employed by users. Kodappully et al (2016) examined where human error in monitoring complex process plants was most likely to occur. Eye tracking was a key measure used to investigate the cognitive processes when operators were dealing with simulated scenarios in which alarms were triggered in complex process plants.…”

“…Both Dehais et al (2014) and Kodappully et al (2016) have demonstrated importance of assessing the combination of visual cues and alarms sounds, neither of these studies deals with the combination of sound, meaning and vision in a healthcare situation or with the issues of discriminability and meaningfulness highlighted earlier. Recent work carried out in our laboratory brought these themes together.…”