2017
DOI: 10.2196/iproc.8441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Precision Stress Management: Design and Evaluation of a Practical Wearable Sensing System for Monitoring Everyday Stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intelligent prompts guided by sensor-driven machine learning algorithms that adapt to the user’s context may be beneficial for increasing user engagement [ 77 - 79 ]. It has also been suggested that tools to unobtrusively gauge and manage day-to-day stress may be improved by considering contextual information [ 34 , 40 , 80 ]. However, other research has shown that after 20 days of receiving machine learning suggestions, participants favored self-selecting their intervention, potentially seeking novelty after the algorithm became too locked in or limited in offerings [ 78 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intelligent prompts guided by sensor-driven machine learning algorithms that adapt to the user’s context may be beneficial for increasing user engagement [ 77 - 79 ]. It has also been suggested that tools to unobtrusively gauge and manage day-to-day stress may be improved by considering contextual information [ 34 , 40 , 80 ]. However, other research has shown that after 20 days of receiving machine learning suggestions, participants favored self-selecting their intervention, potentially seeking novelty after the algorithm became too locked in or limited in offerings [ 78 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further assume that the local controllers act at a faster time-scale than the optimization time-scale, so that they can be considered to act instantaneously 5 . Feedback can be collected via onboard sensors or wearables that infer user's (dis)comfort [68].…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users' feedback comes as a noisy sample of their comfort function, and the noise is modeled as a zero-mean Gaussian variable with variance σ " 0.1. Feedback in this example can come in different ways: it can come at low frequency, if the users are asked to hit the break or the accelerator every time they feel too close or too far from the vehicle in front, or it can come at higher frequency, if the users are equipped with heart rate/breathing rate sensors (which can be in smartwatches or incorporated in the seat of the vehicles [43]) which may be used as proxies of stress and discomfort.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%