2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-47717-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Population-Based Structural Health Monitoring, Part II: Heterogeneous Populations and Structures as Graphs

Abstract: Information about the expected variation in the normal condition and various damage states of a structure is crucial in structural health monitoring. In an ideal case, the behaviour associated with each possible type of damage would be known and classification would be possible. However, it is not realistic to obtain data for every possible damage state in an individual structure. Examining a population of structures gives a much larger pool of data to work with. Machine learning can then potentially allow inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A population, in the context of PBSHM, is a group of structures (the smallest being a group of two structures) that provide information required for performing health monitoring. This general definition of a population can be further divided into two categories: homogenous and heterogeneous populations [3]; these groupings relate to the level of dissimilarity within a population, where both population types benefit from knowledge transfer. Colloquially, a homogeneous population is one in which each structure in the population can be deemed nominally identical for a given context [2,3].…”
Section: Population Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A population, in the context of PBSHM, is a group of structures (the smallest being a group of two structures) that provide information required for performing health monitoring. This general definition of a population can be further divided into two categories: homogenous and heterogeneous populations [3]; these groupings relate to the level of dissimilarity within a population, where both population types benefit from knowledge transfer. Colloquially, a homogeneous population is one in which each structure in the population can be deemed nominally identical for a given context [2,3].…”
Section: Population Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of PBSHM is to incorporate the feature and label data from each aeroplane to generate a machine learning-based approach that generalises across the complete fleet for all damage scenarios, especially when many members of the fleet have no labelled data associated with them. This work is Part IV of a series of papers on PBSHM [2,3,4,5,6], where for an overview of PBSHM and further motivation the reader is referred to earlier parts [2,3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of similarity between two structures will determine the information transfer possible. In order to calculate the degree of similarity between structures, it is first necessary to create an Irreducible Element (IE) model of the structure (as described in [7]) and then convert this IE model into an attributed graph (AG) [8]. This paper will describe how the AGs from two separate structures are compared in order to determine the degree of similarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although applicable to SHM in a broad sense, an ontology could be particularly useful in a Population-based SHM (PBSHM) setting [4,5,6,7,8], where the goal is to develop general inference tools across a population. Here an ontology would identify useful, and perhaps overlooked, connections between objects such as Irreducible Element (IE) models and Atribbuted Graph (AG) representations of structures [5,6] and appropriate knowledge transfer methods like transfer learning [7] and 'forms' [7,4]. This may provide benefits in highlighting appropriate methods for each data source such that destructive phenomenon like negative transfer in transfer learning are avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%