2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1065/16/162018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Photonic based Pascal Realization as a Primary Pressure Standard

Abstract: New techniques using refractometry have enabled gas pressure to be measured using laser interferometry. Two key techniques have been studied at NIST which include the Fixed Length Optical Cavity (FLOC) and the Variable Length Optical Cavity (VLOC). The measurement techniques are described and the traceability of these measurements through quantum mechanics that enables them to be primary standards. This technology is critical for gas pressure metrology to move away from artifact based standards (and especially… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former is generally > 0.2 % because the absolute pressure gauge that measures p ref is currently calibrated through an intermediate transfer standard. By calibrating directly against a pressure standard such as the ultrasonic manometer (UIM) [20] or a fixed-length-optical-cavity (FLOC) [21], we estimate that we can reduce that relative uncertainty to < 0.1 %. At that point, the dominant uncertainty will be due to longterm drifts in the absolute pressure gauge, which is typically < 0.1 % [20].…”
Section: Possible Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is generally > 0.2 % because the absolute pressure gauge that measures p ref is currently calibrated through an intermediate transfer standard. By calibrating directly against a pressure standard such as the ultrasonic manometer (UIM) [20] or a fixed-length-optical-cavity (FLOC) [21], we estimate that we can reduce that relative uncertainty to < 0.1 %. At that point, the dominant uncertainty will be due to longterm drifts in the absolute pressure gauge, which is typically < 0.1 % [20].…”
Section: Possible Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%