2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards personalized assessment of fatigue perpetuating factors in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome using ecological momentary assessment: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such findings of quantitative and qualitative differences strengthen the call for individualized treatment (personalized medicine) focusing on individual-specific weaknesses and strengths, in order to decouple detrimental connections and enforce good ones. This case is built for instance by Worm-Smeitink et al [12], who point out that treatment manuals are often based on results of group-level analyses and therefore ignore possible individual variation in perpetuating factors and their associations with symptoms. Identifying person-specific perpetuating components would allow for more patient-tailored treatment.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Within-person Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings of quantitative and qualitative differences strengthen the call for individualized treatment (personalized medicine) focusing on individual-specific weaknesses and strengths, in order to decouple detrimental connections and enforce good ones. This case is built for instance by Worm-Smeitink et al [12], who point out that treatment manuals are often based on results of group-level analyses and therefore ignore possible individual variation in perpetuating factors and their associations with symptoms. Identifying person-specific perpetuating components would allow for more patient-tailored treatment.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Within-person Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) The assessment of fatigue may be subject to recall bias and does not capture diurnal variation of fatigue. Future studies may want to use methods, such as ecological momentary assessment to overcome this limitation [ 39–41 ]. 7) Although validated questionnaires (such as the Chalder fatigue index) to assess mental (and physical) fatigue are available [ 42 ], self-constructed questions were used to quantify mental fatigue in this study, as was done before in patients with long-COVID [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a categorical variable (affect category) was made to indicate whether participants were predominantly positive (positive affect >4), predominantly negative (negative affect >4) or neither predominantly positive nor negative ('neutral'). All items were based on previously validated questionnaires or ESM studies [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Procedures and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%