2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Ontological Foundations for the Conceptual Modeling of Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this challenge, it has been argued that a paradigm shift is required, one that considers the development and operation of an IS as a continuous knowledge-based activity (Yu, 2009) utilizing conceptual modeling (G. Guizzardi, Wagner, Falbo, Guizzardi, & Almeida, 2013) as a way to bring together an understanding of complex enterprise phenomena and an attempt to design IS solutions that support agility and dynamic change. This paradigm shift is based on three principles: (a) Systems thinking that considers independent components that form a unified whole (Kawalek, 2004;Wilby, Macaulay, & Theodoulidis, 2011); (b) Abstract thinking implying that one moves away from the physical manifestation of processes (Hans-Georg Fill, 2014); and (c) Operational thinking that considers the dynamics of a business process and in particular its behavior over time (Sterman, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this challenge, it has been argued that a paradigm shift is required, one that considers the development and operation of an IS as a continuous knowledge-based activity (Yu, 2009) utilizing conceptual modeling (G. Guizzardi, Wagner, Falbo, Guizzardi, & Almeida, 2013) as a way to bring together an understanding of complex enterprise phenomena and an attempt to design IS solutions that support agility and dynamic change. This paradigm shift is based on three principles: (a) Systems thinking that considers independent components that form a unified whole (Kawalek, 2004;Wilby, Macaulay, & Theodoulidis, 2011); (b) Abstract thinking implying that one moves away from the physical manifestation of processes (Hans-Georg Fill, 2014); and (c) Operational thinking that considers the dynamics of a business process and in particular its behavior over time (Sterman, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We intend to integrate these results with our results of [23,26], which addresses capabilities and some motivational concepts for EA. We also intend to interpret new proposed modeling concepts using the Unified Foundational Ontology [27,28], in an effort to have coherent and aligned enterprise models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concepts introduced in previous versions of the models are depicted in gray-shade (same for the next diagrams). This model is inspired in UFO (Unified Foundational Ontology) (Guizzardi et al, 2013) that is a formal theory describing some of the general concepts used here, namely Type (Universal) and Category, as well as Object, Event, Action and Situation Types. The model regards mostly types of things 1 since it is meant for modeling, for example, the type of event that is expected as consequence of another one, rather then the particular event that was the consequence of another particular one.…”
Section: Conceptual Model and Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%