The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Multiactivity in Social Interaction 2014
DOI: 10.1075/z.187.01had
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards multiactivity as a social and interactional phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further potential risk of in-class social smartphone use comes from the complexity of managing multiple interactional activities at once. The methods used in this study enable us to discern how the in-between spaces emerge in a complex interplay between classroom resources, students and teachers that could be characterized in terms of multiactivity (Haddington, 2019;Haddington et al, 2014). A clear example of this multiactivity is when Anna, as described in the category "The teaching activity does not require the student's full attention," is focusing on off-task social media on her phone at the same time as she is present on-task helping and interplaying with Sofi, who is doing the more attention-demanding work of hammering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A further potential risk of in-class social smartphone use comes from the complexity of managing multiple interactional activities at once. The methods used in this study enable us to discern how the in-between spaces emerge in a complex interplay between classroom resources, students and teachers that could be characterized in terms of multiactivity (Haddington, 2019;Haddington et al, 2014). A clear example of this multiactivity is when Anna, as described in the category "The teaching activity does not require the student's full attention," is focusing on off-task social media on her phone at the same time as she is present on-task helping and interplaying with Sofi, who is doing the more attention-demanding work of hammering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CA is fundamentally concerned with understanding the sequentiality of people's social interactions, whereby people coordinate their actions with each other in joint meaning making in different social situations (Sacks et al, 1974;Schegloff, 2007). Recently, some CA scholars have been especially concerned with how people may be engaged in multiple activities at more or less the same time, which has been described as multiactivity (Haddington, 2019;Haddington et al, 2014;Mondada, 2014). The concept of multiactivity is used to focus on the practical accomplishment of progressing and participating in different simultaneous courses of action and how this is achieved in multimodal interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Student counselors' website 2015) Although student counseling is quite a common form of guidance at least in the European context, there is some variety in what is called student counseling. For example, in the study by Hazel and Mortensen (2014) on student counseling in the Danish context, the counselor is another student, and the participants mainly tackle very practical issues related to studying. The current research steers more toward the therapy end of the scale: All the counselors are licensed psychologists who have some kind of a therapy training.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is itself noteworthy that mobile phone use in the midst of copresent interaction is rarely made accountable throughout our broader collection of interactions involving mobile phones, 7 we found the practice of orally reporting text message content to be a further method for participants to deal with one's mobile-related interactions while also display It is also worth pointing out that the core interactional problems participants deal with throughout our data do not appear to be completely new, nor do they seem oriented to by participants as deserving of moral judgment in practice. The matter of initiating, suspending, and resuming one's activity (whether embodied or verbal) in the midst of a social encounter represents a generic interactional problem that interactants routinely deal with, regardless of its technological dimensions (see Haddington et al, 2014). Furthermore, as others have argued, the use of any new technological means for communication does not necessarily lead to fundamentally different under-standings of communication (Aakhus & DiDomenico, 2016;Aakhus & Jackson, 2005).…”
Section: Explicitly Incorporating the Mts-prompted Action Into The Comentioning
confidence: 99%