2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06)
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2006.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Multi-View Object Class Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
177
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
177
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The canonical parts are regions containing multiple features in the images, and are the building blocks of the model. As previous research has shown, a part based representation [26,28,29] is more stable for capturing the appearance variability across instances of objects. A critical property introduced in [1] is that the canonical part retains the appearance of a region that is viewed most frontally on the object.…”
Section: Overview Of the Savarese Et Al Model [1]mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The canonical parts are regions containing multiple features in the images, and are the building blocks of the model. As previous research has shown, a part based representation [26,28,29] is more stable for capturing the appearance variability across instances of objects. A critical property introduced in [1] is that the canonical part retains the appearance of a region that is viewed most frontally on the object.…”
Section: Overview Of the Savarese Et Al Model [1]mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Recently, a number of works have proposed interesting solutions for capturing the multi-view essence of an object category [1,27,28,29,30,31,32]. These techniques bridge the gap between models that represent an object category from just a single 2D view and models that represent single object instances from multiple views.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many models have only been demonstrated to work with data sets restricted to canonical views of categories. Thomas et al (2006) try to overcome this limitation by training several pose-specific implicit shape models (ISM) (Leibe et al, 2004) for each category. After the training of these ISMs, detected parts from neighboring pose-dependent ISMs are associated by so-called "activation links".…”
Section: Visual Category Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent approaches of this type include [13,17,23]. While 2D singleview object detection methods can be used to addressed the task by combining the outputs of classifiers trained for different object views, such approaches are argued to be only effective when there are sufficient single-view detectors to cover all possible viewpoints [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferrari et al [12] proposed a method to compute feature tracks densely connecting multiple model views of a single object. In [13], Implicit Shape Model [14] and [12] are combined, and activation links for transferring votes across views are used to address the object detection from arbitrary viewpoints. propose a compact model of an object by linking together diagnostic parts of the objects from different viewpoints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%