2015
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2015-15172-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards more accurate and reliable predictions for nuclear applications

Abstract: Abstract. The need for nuclear data far from the valley of stability, for applications such as nuclear astrophysics or future nuclear facilities, challenges the robustness as well as the predictive power of present nuclear models. Most of the nuclear data evaluation and prediction are still performed on the basis of phenomenological nuclear models. For the last decades, important progress has been achieved in fundamental nuclear physics, making it now feasible to use more reliable, but also more complex micros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include both fission barriers and collective inertial masses. Recent global calculations [81][82][83] have mainly focussed on the description of fission barriers neglecting the important role of collective masses that are normally described using a simple phenomenological prescription [84] in rprocess applications. Furthermore, it is important to address the impact of dynamical versus static descriptions of fission observables [85,86] Beta-decay half-lives have not been consistently computed with the mass models explored in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include both fission barriers and collective inertial masses. Recent global calculations [81][82][83] have mainly focussed on the description of fission barriers neglecting the important role of collective masses that are normally described using a simple phenomenological prescription [84] in rprocess applications. Furthermore, it is important to address the impact of dynamical versus static descriptions of fission observables [85,86] Beta-decay half-lives have not been consistently computed with the mass models explored in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also follow the decay back to stability during the r-process freeze-out and the competition between late neutron captures and neutron release by fission and β-decays of heavy nuclei (see similar discussions of freeze-out effects without including fission in Mumpower et al 2012 and the references therein). Late neutron captures have a direct effect on the final position of the third r-process peak (also seen in Goriely et al 2013 andGoriely 2015). To study the dependence of the final abundance distribution on the freeze-out characteristics, we pick a typical trajectory from the same database of trajectories 11 that was used in Korobkin et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also remains of first importance to estimate the statistical as well as systematic uncertainties affecting the predictions far away from the experimentally known region. Such a difficult task has been started regarding mass predictions [17], but remains to be performed for the reaction as well as β-decay rates. Our capacity to predict the fundamental nuclear ingredients for reaction models, namely nuclear masses, optical potentials, γ-ray strength functions, nuclear level densities, fission barriers, as well as the predictive power of the reaction and β-decay models are discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Nuclear Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our capacity to predict the fundamental nuclear ingredients for reaction models, namely nuclear masses, optical potentials, γ-ray strength functions, nuclear level densities, fission barriers, as well as the predictive power of the reaction and β-decay models are discussed in Ref. [17].…”
Section: Nuclear Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%