Towards meaningful geographical indications: Validating terroirs on a 200 km2 scale in Australia's lower Hunter Valley

Coggins, Sam; Malone, Brendan; Stockmann, Uta; Possell, Malcolm; McBratney, Alex B.

doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2019.e00209

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The study results show that there is a low positive correlation between them, indicating that geographical indication products have a positive influence on the growth of the agricultural economy. This finding has supported the first viewpoint and the results of most current studies [53]. At the same time, the results have clarified the different correlation sizes and directions argued in these studies.…”

Section: Relationship Between Geographical Indication Products and Ag...supporting

confidence: 88%

Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis

Li,

Gao,

et al. 2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Do geographical indication products help facilitate the development of the agricultural economy? This problem is a point of controversy in the field of global agricultural intellectual property. For a long time, there have been different viewpoints on this problem; that is, there is a positive correlation, negative correlation, U-shape correlation, or no correlation between the geographical indication products and the development of the agricultural economy in the context of different studies. To clarify the influence mechanism between the two and explain why there are these disputes, this study used the meta-analysis method to statistically reanalyze 405 observation values provided in 64 independent research samples from the context of different regions around the world. The study results show that geographical indications not only generate more economic benefits than ordinary products but also contribute to the growth of the agricultural economy by effectively promoting the development of agricultural product trade and the enhancement of agricultural product price. There exists a low positive correlation between the geographical indication products and the agricultural economy (r = 0.176, 95% CI = [0.126, 0.225]). In addition, the promotion effect of geographical indication products on the agricultural economy is regulated by the country of origin of the samples, sample level, publication journal, data type, data acquisition approach, and research method. Our research findings further revealed the internal relationship mechanism between the geographical indication products and the agricultural economy and lay a foundation for better protecting and developing geographical indication products.

show abstract

Section: Relationship Between Geographical Indication Products and Ag...supporting

confidence: 88%

Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis

Li,

Gao,

et al. 2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the one hand, there are different research methods: existing literature involves two main categories of research methods, namely, multiple linear regression analysis and other methods. Different research methods have certain differences in assumptions and applicability, which may lead to diversity in research results [42]. For instance, Stanley (2021) used multiple linear regression analysis to analyze the economic benefits of GI products, finding that unique GI products often have unique flavors, quality, or production processes, giving them a competitive advantage in the market and attracting consumers willing to pay higher prices, thereby contributing to increased farmer incomes [43].…”

Section: Sources Of Differences In Methodological Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship between Geographical Indication Products and Farmers’ Incomes Based on Meta-Analysis

Li,

Ban,

et al. 2024

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geographical indication (GI) products serve as one of the significant instruments for increasing farmers’ income. While most studies affirmatively indicate that GI products contribute to boosting farmers’ income growth, it is noteworthy that their relationship does not consistently demonstrate a positive correlation. The academic discourse on this issue remains inconclusive. This study employs a meta-analysis method to reanalyze 140 effect sizes from 32 independent research samples across diverse global contexts. The findings reveal that the development of GI products significantly promotes farmer income growth, showing a high positive correlation (r = 0.348, CI = [0.104, 0.540]). Specifically, there exists a high positive correlation between GI products and per capita disposable income (r = 0.389) and a moderate positive correlation between GI products and agricultural product prices (r = 0.255). Further analysis indicates that factors at the sample level, literature level, and methodological level all exert moderating effects on the relationship between GI products and farmers’ income. This study not only provides a scientific response to the debate surrounding the relationship between GI products and farmers’ income but also delves into the underlying mechanisms. It holds significant importance for advancing the rational optimization of agricultural resources and enhancing agricultural competitiveness.

show abstract

“…This means that GIs could contribute to a territorial public system and how the global market for certain products could threaten this area, however by acknowledgment of GIs the area geographically has been protected and maintained in original condition. The benefit of GIs will go to the local community and the local government at both provincial and regency levels (Coggins, Malone et al, 2019;Das, 2010;Effida, Susilowati et al, 2015).…”

Section: Gis and Land Suitabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Geographical Indications for <i>Tapaktuan-Blangpidie</i> Nutmeg in Aceh, Indonesia:

Sugianto,

Rusdi,

Basri

et al. 2024

IRSPSD International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

have been known since the 17th century as the best nutmeg production areas in the world. However, this area has no legally declared Geographical Indication (GI) for nutmeg. As a result, the world has yet to recognise this fact because there is no acknowledgment, and it is not recorded in the form of regional intellectual property rights, known as GIs. This paper analyses the requirements and the allocation areas based on the suitability and spatial planning of South Aceh Regency and Southwest Aceh Regency for GI determination for nutmeg. Land suitability and spatial planning, field data collection for existing nutmeg plants, and geographic information system analysis were employed for GI determination. The results show that the proposed GIs of Tapaktuan-Blangpidie nutmeg have actual land suitability as suitable, moderately suitable, and marginally suitable. The area is ideal with a small proportion being moderately suitable. From the spatial planning point of view, the proposed GI coverage is 69,469.21 hectares. The location of the nutmeg plants in Southwest Aceh Regency occupies 27.71% of Tapaktuan-Blangpidie's proposed GI area for nutmeg. The proposed GI nutmeg area matches 6.69% of the spatial pattern of South Aceh Regency and Southwest Aceh Regency. The determination of GIs of Tapaktuan-Blangpidie nutmeg is biophysical, and spatial planning is appropriate to fulfil the requirements for GIs of the area. The approach for determining GIs using land suitability and spatial planning of the regencies has shown the determination of potential GIs for the area.

show abstract

Towards meaningful geographical indications: Validating terroirs on a 200 km2 scale in Australia's lower Hunter Valley

Cited by 11 publications

References 28 publications

Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis

Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis

The Relationship between Geographical Indication Products and Farmers’ Incomes Based on Meta-Analysis

Geographical Indications for <i>Tapaktuan-Blangpidie</i> Nutmeg in Aceh, Indonesia:

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Towards meaningful geographical indications: Validating terroirs on a 200 km2 scale in Australia's lower Hunter Valley

Cited by 11 publications

References 28 publications

Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis

Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis

The Relationship between Geographical Indication Products and Farmers’ Incomes Based on Meta-Analysis

Geographical Indications for <i>Tapaktuan-Blangpidie</i> Nutmeg in Aceh, Indonesia:

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Towards meaningful geographical indications: Validating terroirs on a 200 km2 scale in Australia's lower Hunter Valley