2021
DOI: 10.3390/a14020034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Interactive Analytics over RDF Graphs

Abstract: The continuous accumulation of multi-dimensional data and the development of Semantic Web and Linked Data published in the Resource Description Framework (RDF) bring new requirements for data analytics tools. Such tools should take into account the special features of RDF graphs, exploit the semantics of RDF and support flexible aggregate queries. In this paper, we present an approach for applying analytics to RDF data based on a high-level functional query language, called HIFUN. According to that language, e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches use several techniques for retrieving the best match results, by exploiting Information Retrieval (IR) techniques [18,19], and/or by adapting existing IR systems, like Elasticsearch, to the needs of RDF, for example, see [1,2,20] and others. As regards (c), there are several interactive information access systems, including browsing systems, such as [3,4,21] and also systems that can aid users that are not familiar with query languages to access the RDF knowledge base, for example, faceted search [6,7,13], interactive analytics services [22,23] and also systems for assisting the query building process, such as the system A-Qub [8]. Finally, regarding (d) Natural Language interface systems [24], where the input and output is given in natural language, and it returns short and precise answers, that is, through conversational access and Question Answering systems [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Access Systems Over Rdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches use several techniques for retrieving the best match results, by exploiting Information Retrieval (IR) techniques [18,19], and/or by adapting existing IR systems, like Elasticsearch, to the needs of RDF, for example, see [1,2,20] and others. As regards (c), there are several interactive information access systems, including browsing systems, such as [3,4,21] and also systems that can aid users that are not familiar with query languages to access the RDF knowledge base, for example, faceted search [6,7,13], interactive analytics services [22,23] and also systems for assisting the query building process, such as the system A-Qub [8]. Finally, regarding (d) Natural Language interface systems [24], where the input and output is given in natural language, and it returns short and precise answers, that is, through conversational access and Question Answering systems [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Access Systems Over Rdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several tools and platforms have been developed for exploring and visualizing RDF and linked data 14 – 21 , but a common thread in these systems is the use of a typology to define charts (e.g., bar charts, pie charts, scatter plots). Extensive research in data visualization has illuminated the deeper structure underlying most data graphics wherein graphical primitives known as data marks (e.g., point, line, area, text) have properties that can be encoded through channels (e.g., position, color, size, opacity) by mapping data attributes along discrete or continuous scales 22 , 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the sources of the knowledge graph (KG), source selection methods have been proposed, regardless of its application, in the topic of data integration that is represented in three main approaches: materialization ( Papadaki, Tzitzikas & Spyratos, 2020 ; Papadaki, Spyratos & Tzitzikas, 2021 ), mediation ( Farré, Varga & Almar, 2019 ; Ekaputra et al, 2017 ), and virtual ( Endris et al, 2017 ; Algosaibi, 2021 ). The mediation approach, among these approaches, creates a balance between the cost of storage and time response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%