Towards Inclusive Water Governance: OECD Evidence and Key Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in the Water Sector

Abstract

Citizens increasingly demand to be more engaged in how public policy decisions are made. In this environment, stakeholder engagement has emerged as a principle of good water governance. However, despite extensive research and case studies on the topic in recent years, the lack of evidence-based assessment on how effective engagement processes have proven to be in reaching intended objectives of water governance is striking. Most participatory evaluation exercises fail to provide decision-makers with the evidence they need to inform future engagement processes.This chapter presents the key fi ndings of an OECD study, which relies mainly on empirical data from a survey carried out across 215 stakeholders, within and outside the water sector, and derived from 69 case studies collected worldwide. It suggests an analytical framework to assess the impact of stakeholder engagement in waterrelated decision-making and policy implementation, based on interdependent components, i.e. drivers, obstacles, mechanisms, impacts, costs and benefi ts.Results highlight the need for better understanding of the pressing and emerging issues related to stakeholder engagement. These include the external and internal drivers that trigger the engagement processes, the arrival of new entrants that ought to be considered, innovative tools that have emerged to manage the interface between multiple players and types of costs and benefi ts incurred by engagement at policy and project levels. The chapter concludes with policy guidance to decisionmakers and practitioners in the form of necessary conditions on how to set up the enabling environment for inclusive water governance.

Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: a narrative review

“…Formalised governance spaces have the potential to promote strong legitimacy, better-informed stakeholders, confident, committed, and skilled staff, and stakeholders [ 61 ]. Our review identified significant policy/implementation gaps, demonstrating that community participation is not just about creating structures but functionally and sustainably transferring power and authority to marginalized people.…”

Sustainable Management for Healthy and Productive Watersheds in Indonesia

“…Successful community engagement in watershed management requires a process that brings together stakeholders, including government agencies, non-profit organizations, and community groups [160,167]. Community participation can include various activities, such as education and training, citizen science, and volunteering, and can take the form of public meetings, seminars, and outreach initiatives.…”

The Integration of Local Actors in Policy Implementation: The Case of Organic Farming in Costa Rica

“…Likewise, recent literature on energy transition often concentrates on the role of local and civic actors, and scholars widely agree that, among other factors, their inclusion is a central aspect in the transition to renewable energy [37,38]. Nabiafjadi et al [39], who conducted an empirical network analysis in the Middle East about water governance, emphasized the need to decentralize administration to local, private, or non-governmental actors in order to improve water governance [40]. Hegga et al went one step further, examining what actual capacities local actors-who seem to be already integrated into the implementation of policies through decentralization in water services-need in order to successfully participate in the operation and management of water services [41].…”