2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards improving the enhanced Craig-Bampton method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Craig-Bampton method 24,25 was used to implement kinetic condensation in building a rigid-flexible coupling dynamic model. This method divides model nodes into boundary and internal nodes.…”
Section: Transmission System Modal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Craig-Bampton method 24,25 was used to implement kinetic condensation in building a rigid-flexible coupling dynamic model. This method divides model nodes into boundary and internal nodes.…”
Section: Transmission System Modal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the deformation description of modal flexible body, the flexible body is regarded as a set of nodes of FE model, and the elasticity of object is represented by modal. The traditional Craig-Bampton method divides the elastic structure into n sub-structures, and the transformation relationship between the modal coordinates and physical coordinates of the sub-structures can be deduced as 31,32 …”
Section: Flexible Multi-body Dynamics Modelling Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECB method considers the first order term of the residual flexibility in an infinite series expansion for dominant modal correction; nevertheless, it shows dramatic accuracy improvement, over (around) three or four digits, of the CB-reduced matrices, without increasing the number of the dominant modes. The ECB method has provided motives to many following works, such as iterative algorithms, considering higher order residual terms [20][21][22], precise stochastic model reduction [23], multiscale model reduction [24,25], eigenvalue problem solvers [26], etc. Kim et al [27] generalized the model reduction with the residual flexibility, and summarized the relationship between the CMS and dynamic condensation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%