Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry - SCG '88 1988
DOI: 10.1145/73393.73405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards implementing robust geometric computations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, robustness issues are an important issue in polygon intersection tests [Hoffmann et al, 1988].…”
Section: T V  P Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, robustness issues are an important issue in polygon intersection tests [Hoffmann et al, 1988].…”
Section: T V  P Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few years ago these observations led Bernard Chazelle to pose the problem of how large a grid was needed to accommodate all simple planar npoint configurations up to order type [4]. An answer to Chazelle's question is relevant to the computational problem of accurately representing configurations of points and arrangements of lines [6] in an environment of finite precision arithmetic; see also [5,11,14,18,20], in which the problem of finding robust geometric algorithms in such an environment is addressed. In this paper we solve Chazelle's problem by proving In §2 we establish the lower bound by first constructing a "rigid" configuration that is very spread out in the intuitive sense, then modify it via a recent construction of [15] to a configuration of points in general position which achieves at least the same spread in every realization.…”
Section: Where (P(o) •• P(d)} Denotes the Simplex Spanned By The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that if the algorithm cannot decide between any two cases, it will simply merge the corresponding uncertainty intervals. 3 Approximate Point Inclusion…”
Section: Betweennessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is more similar to those of Milenkovic [S] and of Hoffmann, Hopcroft, and Karasick [3]. These methods compute an exact result for a perturbed version of the input data, but they assume a perturbation bounded by a constant chosen a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%