2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards human-robot collaboration in meat processing: Challenges and possibilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, human-cobot collaboration is mainly tackled, as supported also by the results of the recent work by Aliev & Antonelli (2021). Indeed, these research works focused on the human-cobot interaction for various sectors (such as the meat production (Romanov et al, 2022) and civil engineering (Nagatani et al, 2021)) and operations (e.g., for productivity improvement (Mitrea & Tamas, 2018) and internal logistics (Donadio et al, 2018)). Most of the works focused on safety issues related to the use of collaborative robots in the same work environments as humans, by favouring the interaction (Bagheri et al, 2022), defining algorithms for trajectories and collisions prediction (Zhang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Content Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As a matter of fact, human-cobot collaboration is mainly tackled, as supported also by the results of the recent work by Aliev & Antonelli (2021). Indeed, these research works focused on the human-cobot interaction for various sectors (such as the meat production (Romanov et al, 2022) and civil engineering (Nagatani et al, 2021)) and operations (e.g., for productivity improvement (Mitrea & Tamas, 2018) and internal logistics (Donadio et al, 2018)). Most of the works focused on safety issues related to the use of collaborative robots in the same work environments as humans, by favouring the interaction (Bagheri et al, 2022), defining algorithms for trajectories and collisions prediction (Zhang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Content Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, on account of peculiarity of animal carcasses and the locations obtained from them, robotization and automation processes are a challenge for Meat 4.0. Despite this initial complexity, the development and implementation of robotization and automation are of special interest because the slaughter tasks and the secondary processing of the carcasses are labours that currently involve most of the manual work, which is repetitive and must be done at high speed [32]. Although it is true that in the case of slaughterhouses many processing operations (stunning, bleeding, scalding, plucking, skinning, evisceration, splitting, and cooling) are already successfully automated [57], in the secondary processing of meat, hardware and software must be developed so that robots can offer a flexible, scalable, compact, and profitable alternative in the production line [32].…”
Section: Industry 40 Technologies Applied For Meat Processing and Pre...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the current trend rejects continuing to implement systems based on hard work performed by operators with the aim of providing a higher quality of work and reducing pathologies associated with it (musculoskeletal disorders). For this reason, technologies that combine human-robot collaboration are being investigated, creating the so-called CoBots, which would represent a very useful tool in the meat industry [32]. In addition, the use of CoBots would facilitate the inclusion of newly arrived operators since it would permit them to obtain a step-by-step approach to processing, achieving their training.…”
Section: Industry 40 Technologies Applied For Meat Processing and Pre...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3208667 available to the sector, its use is often limited for economic reasons: simply put, today's equipment is too expensive for the majority of small-and medium-scale processers and lacks reasonable financial (and technical) scalability. With increased customization for both hardware and software, robots can offer a flexible, scalable, compact, and cost-effective production line alternative to older machinery that require large floor space, are difficult to adapt, and include higher maintenance costs [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%