2016
DOI: 10.1172/jci80561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards HIV-1 remission: potential roles for broadly neutralizing antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Q 2 VOA may be a sensitive assay with which to measure changes in the reservoir that result from immune-targeted interventions (39)(40)(41)(42). Viruses isolated from the replication-competent latent reservoir demonstrated a broad range of neutralization sensitivity to bNAbs, and may also show differing levels of sensitivity to immune-based interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Q 2 VOA may be a sensitive assay with which to measure changes in the reservoir that result from immune-targeted interventions (39)(40)(41)(42). Viruses isolated from the replication-competent latent reservoir demonstrated a broad range of neutralization sensitivity to bNAbs, and may also show differing levels of sensitivity to immune-based interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, MAbs likely exert anti-HIV effects in multiple ways, including by prevention of cellular infection; targeting of infected cells, including FcR-positive cells or complement, for destruction by Fc-mediated effects (6)(7)(8)(9); or delivery of a toxic payload to cells in the form of immunoconjugates (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). It is often assumed that the same MAbs that prevent the transmission of infection are also the most effective in eliminating persistently infected cells (21,22), despite evidence to the contrary (6,13,16,19). Now that a new generation of broadly neutralizing MAbs (bnMAbs) has been developed (1-4, 8, 9, 23-27), it is important to revisit this issue.…”
Section: Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kick-and-kill paradigm gained traction when it was demonstrated that latency reversal (kick) alone, with the LRA vorinostat, was insufficient to cause the death of infected cells in a postactivation in vitro latency model, whereas the addition of expanded HIV-specific CD8 + T cells resulted in infected cell elimination (5). Others have since reported similar results using additional in vitro latency models, combined with natural or engineered CD8 + T cells, or NK cells as effectors (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). These results have motivated the translation of the kick-and-kill approach into clinical trials that, thus far, have failed to achieve reductions in infectious viral reservoirs (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%