2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(03)00128-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards fully digital magnetometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feedback electronics can also introduce their own noise floor into the measurement process, and finally, a highamplitude, high-frequency, bias signals often increase the noise floor of the system. Others techniques include: pulse-position, pulse-height, and fully digital designs [11,34]. Pulse-position, in a fluxgate, for instance, keeps track of changes in the pulse positions of the voltage in the pickup coil, while pulseheight measures the differences between positive and negative peaks.…”
Section: Sensing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedback electronics can also introduce their own noise floor into the measurement process, and finally, a highamplitude, high-frequency, bias signals often increase the noise floor of the system. Others techniques include: pulse-position, pulse-height, and fully digital designs [11,34]. Pulse-position, in a fluxgate, for instance, keeps track of changes in the pulse positions of the voltage in the pickup coil, while pulseheight measures the differences between positive and negative peaks.…”
Section: Sensing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FG is a non-linear sensor [1], which does not perform any inherent smoothing of the incident field, and a closed-loop measurement is necessary to increase the linear range of the sensor. Recent attempts to return a 1-bit magnetic field have shown linearity limitations [3,4]. Consequently, a low-pass filtering of the 1-bit IIR output is required for high resolution architectures.…”
Section: B Fully Low-pass Asic : Architecture and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While µFG exhibit a lower sensitivity and greater magnetic noise compared to fluxgate sensors, this can be partially counteracted by an increase of their excitation frequency. Digital signal interfaces [3] seem to be great candidates for µFG magnetometers, considering their simple implementation in regard to their higher performance and adjustability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Overhauser magnetometer has a resolution of 0.01 nT and the power consumption is only 0.5 W at a sampling rate of 5 seconds, but it can also only perform scalar measurements of the magnetic field. Only the SQUID magnetometer is more sensitive than the fluxgate sensor among the current vector sensors [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Nevertheless, the high demand for liquid helium or nitrogen (for high temperature SQUIDs) and the limited dynamic range make their use limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%