2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2014.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards first principles modeling of electrochemical electrode–electrolyte interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1f should not be a candidate for equilibrium interfaces, 68 at least under these UHV conditions. If a liquid electrolyte is present, it cannot be ruled out that Li + vacancy near the outer surface may be stabilized; we speculate that this could even yield a multitude of equilibrium Li + configurations in Li-containing films, and therefore more than one PZC at different voltages.…”
Section: B Lithium Metal Cohesive Energy (V I ) For Voltagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1f should not be a candidate for equilibrium interfaces, 68 at least under these UHV conditions. If a liquid electrolyte is present, it cannot be ruled out that Li + vacancy near the outer surface may be stabilized; we speculate that this could even yield a multitude of equilibrium Li + configurations in Li-containing films, and therefore more than one PZC at different voltages.…”
Section: B Lithium Metal Cohesive Energy (V I ) For Voltagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several approaches have been developed to address the issue of constant electrode potential [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], a prerequisite to study electrochemical reactions. These approaches are thermodynamically open with respect to electrons, but canonical with respect to protons, as pointed out by Rossmeisl and co-workers [9]. For example, enforcing a specific pH value would require an exchange of protons with a chemical reservoir.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, one needs extra measures of caution when computationally assessing the electrochemical stability of an electrolyte. Currently, the AIMD approach suffers from unrealistic configurations of the interfaces due to the limited number of solvent molecules explicitly included in calculations which leads to ambiguity in the definition of the electrode potential, 12 insufficient accounting for the dielectric response of the liquid environment, [13][14][15][16] erroneous assessments of the potential of zero charge (PZC), 15,17,[18][19][20][21][22] the spatial profile of the average electrostatic potential in the EDL and its capacitance. Moreover, in practically realizable unit cells for AIMD even an elementary fluctuation of the ion distribution or polar solvent molecules near the interface, caused by either thermal motion or by the loss of inventory accompanying reduction, causes a drastic change, on the order of ±1.0 V, in the calculated electrode potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%