2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Feature-based Human-robot Assembly Process Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both can have variations to be handled during production (e.g., alternative components or subassemblies). Even an unambiguous set of components can have multiple orders of assembly [17], and the particular choice may depend on actors and resources at hand. A systematic approach to constructing a symbiotic HRC environment can be understood as a series of analysis and synthesis steps starting with a formal description of tasks, agents and premises, proceeding towards a feasible solution in a partly automated way, while providing the possibility of reiteration and introduction of implicit knowledge at points of manual intervention into the elaboration process.…”
Section: Symbiotic Hrc Structure In Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both can have variations to be handled during production (e.g., alternative components or subassemblies). Even an unambiguous set of components can have multiple orders of assembly [17], and the particular choice may depend on actors and resources at hand. A systematic approach to constructing a symbiotic HRC environment can be understood as a series of analysis and synthesis steps starting with a formal description of tasks, agents and premises, proceeding towards a feasible solution in a partly automated way, while providing the possibility of reiteration and introduction of implicit knowledge at points of manual intervention into the elaboration process.…”
Section: Symbiotic Hrc Structure In Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 bottom right), while the planning and worker assistance are powered by the private cloud in the backend. The assembly plans are validated by geometric reasoning [17]. At this stage of implementation, the main contribution is to validate the feasibility of transforming conventional industrial robotic cells into collaborative environments based on the symbiotic system architecture discussed in section 3.…”
Section: Implementation and Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al 23 introduced a reinforcement learning method for automatic positioning and fastening of product modules to enable an automatic operation for improved efficiency and accuracy of the mechanical product assembly. Focused on features, Kardos et al 24,25 proposed generic approaches to automated robotic assembly process planning with a feature-based model of the assembly process, and assembly planning that combined individual tasks into an optimal assembly plan subject to technological and geometric constraints. Sheng et al 26 proposed a rapid virtual assembly system based on the smart recognition of assembly features, simplifying the assembly process, increasing the assembly design efficiency, and reducing the workload and operational complexity.…”
Section: Related Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach proposed earlier in [16], the investigation of potential collisions is performed in two steps: (i) for the core movement captured by the assembly feature, and (ii) for the approach of the moved parts and the tool to the region of interest. In both cases, collision detection is performed using the Flexible Collision Library (FCL) [17] on the triangle mesh models of the involved objects.…”
Section: Sub-problem: Collision Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%