2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(03)00173-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards fault-tolerant active control of rotor–magnetic bearing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also anticipated that the recovery controller will yield low bearing static stiffness and therefore poor steady-state support. Therefore, a switching scheme is utilized for implementation of the recovery controller [4]. In AMB systems, for safety reasons, it is common to set a deflection limit at which power is removed from the AMBs and motor, in order to prevent the loss of stability.…”
Section: Results Of Controller Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also anticipated that the recovery controller will yield low bearing static stiffness and therefore poor steady-state support. Therefore, a switching scheme is utilized for implementation of the recovery controller [4]. In AMB systems, for safety reasons, it is common to set a deflection limit at which power is removed from the AMBs and motor, in order to prevent the loss of stability.…”
Section: Results Of Controller Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is exacerbated by the coincidence of unbalance forces. Second, shaft contact with the touchdown (TD) bearings while rotating will impart other forces on the rotor and may result in a so-called contact mode of vibration [4]. TD bearings are usually traditional bearings that are oversized for the shaft and do not touch the shaft during levitation but rather catch the shaft in the event of levitation failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive study of fault scenarios for AMBs is provided in [5] where faults are categorized by type, effect and feasibility of fault tolerance. From the study of these scenarios three fault categories emerge that are not related to the rotor and are not dependent on physical redundancy for fault tolerant behaviour: actuator faults & failures; sensor faults & failures; software errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much attention have been devoted to sensor faults, see e.g. [4], [5], [12], [13], [16]. To ensure fault tolerance with respect to the AMBs both sensor and actuator faults must be mitigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research activities have concentrated on developing adaptive magnetic bearing controllers to prevent the rotor contact with auxiliary bearings under transient loading, or if the contact does occur, to minimize the impact damage and to recover the rotor position as quickly as possible without the necessity to shut down the system [2,3]. Fault detection and tolerance systems mainly concentrate on identifying faults in sensors or magnetic bearing coils, and are usually based on a stochastic approach [4][5][6]. Sahinkaya [7] investigated fault detection at rotor systems with active magnetic bearings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%