The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2252631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Faster Solution of Large Power Flow Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also shown in Table 1 is the maximum number of hierarchy levels for each of the networks. Note that we do not use the small-angle approximation in (18), but use the exact angle update.…”
Section: Smoothingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also shown in Table 1 is the maximum number of hierarchy levels for each of the networks. Note that we do not use the small-angle approximation in (18), but use the exact angle update.…”
Section: Smoothingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While multigrid is not the only class of methods with this feature (e.g., see [36] for graph Laplacian linear solvers), achieving algorithmic scalability typically requires the use of some coarse problem hierarchy. With the exception of the AMG preconditioner in [18], the solvers in the above papers do not make use of a hierarchy of coarse problems. Recently, [28] also proposed the use of multigrid in the time domain for dynamic power grid simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the computation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors is usually the most challenging and time-consuming part of the analysis, investigations on methods capable of handling matrices with multiple and clustered eigenvalues can be worthy and timely. Despite that Krylov methods have already been tested for iterative solution of linear systems in power flow (Poma et al 2017;Idema et al 2013;Pessanha et al 2011), and time domain (Pessanha et al 2013), a modest interest in such methods for small-signal stability problems emerged in the last decade with promising results (Chabane and Hellal 2014;Chung and Dai 2013;Li et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Krylov-subspace methods are not still of widespread usage in the Power Systems community, as is for the PDE-simulation researchers, their use has gained increasing attention, as well as the emerging GPU computing [26] [27].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%