2013 24th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications 2013
DOI: 10.1109/dexa.2013.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Explaining Latent Factors with Topic Models in Collaborative Recommender Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…State-of-the-art approches to generate recommendations from positive ratings only are often based on standard matrix factorization. However, they offer low interpretability because "latent factors obtained with mathematical methods applied to the user-item matrix can be hardly interpreted by humans" [35]. Similar observations have been made in several works [3], [36], [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…State-of-the-art approches to generate recommendations from positive ratings only are often based on standard matrix factorization. However, they offer low interpretability because "latent factors obtained with mathematical methods applied to the user-item matrix can be hardly interpreted by humans" [35]. Similar observations have been made in several works [3], [36], [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Item-and user-based techniques yield a reasoning of the sort "similar users have also bought", but are often outperformed by latent factor models, such as matrix factorization approaches [20]. Matrix factorization techniques in their traditional form predict ratings or preferences well, but the latent features make it difficult to explain a recommendation [3], [36], [35]. Recently, [51] investigated a method for explainable factorization by extracting explicit factors (sentiment, keywords, etc) from user reviews; however such an approach is applicable only in the presence of additional textual information for each training example.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we recommend the items whose ratings are higher than others for the user [11]. The common models of CF include Bayesian Networks [12], latent factor models [13], Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) [14], matrix factorization [15], and Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (PLSA) [16]. In these methods, the matrix factorization method is the most widely used, because it can effectively extract some latent features between users and items with the matrix decomposition [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuan Zhang et al proposed a method based on graph and the label applying to recommendation systems [20]. The successful experiment results of these methods show the CF based on graph that has some advantages compared to the existing methods [1], because they can learn more latent information in the network [13]. However, most of the methods based on the graph are nonlinear, which predict the users' ratings of unknown items by using a single classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recommendation area, a prominent approaches is the collaborative filtering (CF) [22] that recommends items based on ratings of users with common interests to the target user. The state-of-theart in recommendation field is formed by latent factor models [18], where some of the most successful implementations are based on Matrix Factorization (MF) [12]. In its basic form, the MF characterizes users and items with vectors of latent factors inferred from the pattern of the rated items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%