2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.13479
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Explaining Expressive Qualities in Piano Recordings: Transfer of Explanatory Features via Acoustic Domain Adaptation

Abstract: Emotion and expressivity in music have been topics of considerable interest in the field of music information retrieval. In recent years, mid-level perceptual features have been suggested as means to explain computational predictions of musical emotion. We find that the diversity of musical styles and genres in the available dataset for learning these features is not sufficient for models to generalise well to specialised acoustic domains such as solo piano music. In this work, we show that by utilising unsupe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An immediate next step that we are currently pursuing is to extend audioLIME to provide explanations in the form of temporal segments using semantic music segmentation, along with the sound sources. We are also looking at explaining emotion conveyed in classical piano performances, which pose particular challenges -including the non-availability of training data, where transfer learning of explanatory features becomes necessary [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An immediate next step that we are currently pursuing is to extend audioLIME to provide explanations in the form of temporal segments using semantic music segmentation, along with the sound sources. We are also looking at explaining emotion conveyed in classical piano performances, which pose particular challenges -including the non-availability of training data, where transfer learning of explanatory features becomes necessary [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%