2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.12.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards excluding redundancy in electrode grid for automatic speech recognition based on surface EMG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a large number of electrodes would lead to high computational complexity, overfitting of redundant data, and an increase in the system cost. The electrode optimization could help to greatly reduce the redundancy by selecting optimal positions where the activities of all different muscles could be recorded using a significantly reduced number of electrodes, which is also supported by the findings of related studies [16,29,30]. By employing electrode optimization, a system with a minimum number of electrodes would be easier to operate and more comfortable for the subjects, which may facilitate widespread applications of automatic speech recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, a large number of electrodes would lead to high computational complexity, overfitting of redundant data, and an increase in the system cost. The electrode optimization could help to greatly reduce the redundancy by selecting optimal positions where the activities of all different muscles could be recorded using a significantly reduced number of electrodes, which is also supported by the findings of related studies [16,29,30]. By employing electrode optimization, a system with a minimum number of electrodes would be easier to operate and more comfortable for the subjects, which may facilitate widespread applications of automatic speech recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Towards addressing the limitations of acoustic signals, surface electromyography (sEMG) that consists of electrophysiology information of muscles associated with speaking has been considered as an alternative input for automatic speech recognition [13][14][15][16]. Compared with the acoustic signals, the sEMG signals would not be affected by interferences from the acoustic ambient noises, making it possible to achieve accurate recognition of human speech even in noisy environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speaking different words or languages requires different ways of pronunciation and therefore involves different muscular contraction patterns, which could be recorded by a non-invasive technique called surface electromyography (sEMG) via placing EMG sensors on the skin surface for measuring the corresponding electrical signals. Since the sEMG signals contain substantial dynamic information about the articulatory muscle activities, the sEMG sensors could be used in automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems that convert the electrical sEMG signals associated with human speaking into computer-readable textual messages [1]. Unlike conventional recognition methods using the human voice collecting from acoustic sensors, the sEMG-based ASR systems do not rely on any acoustic signals, that are not always available and easily contaminated by various environmental noises.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%