2019 IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/wf-iot.2019.8767193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Energy Efficient LPWANs through Learning-based Multi-hop Routing

Abstract: Low-power wide area networks (LPWANs) have been identified as one of the top emerging wireless technologies due to their autonomy and wide range of applications. Yet, the limited energy resources of battery-powered sensor nodes is a top constraint, especially in single-hop topologies, where nodes located far from the base station must conduct uplink (UL) communications in high power levels. On this point, multihop routings in the UL are starting to gain attention due to their capability of reducing energy cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Receive windows of nodes: Not specify. Payload: Not specify Barrachina et al [26] presented a simple Reinforce Learning approach based on epsilon-greedy to enable high reliability and low power consumption in LPWAN networks. In the proposed approach, nodes closer to the gateway act as relay nodes.…”
Section: Time Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Receive windows of nodes: Not specify. Payload: Not specify Barrachina et al [26] presented a simple Reinforce Learning approach based on epsilon-greedy to enable high reliability and low power consumption in LPWAN networks. In the proposed approach, nodes closer to the gateway act as relay nodes.…”
Section: Time Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In leakage detection scenarios, nodes are deployed underground inside the pipelines. In such conditions, the only way to power them is the use of non-replaceable and non-rechargeable batteries [15] CCT-based P 99% Flooding Lee and Ke [16] CCT-based P 99.9% Tree Zhu et al [17] CCT-based P 85% Tree Paul [18] CCT-based Simulation(S) NS Tree Duong and Kim [20] CCT-based P 80% Flooding Farooq [22] CCT-based P NS Tree Liao et al [23] CCT-based P NS Flooding Mai and Kim [24] CCT-based P 90% Flooding Barrachina et al [26] CCT-based P 95% Tree Sartori et al [27] IPV6-based P 96% Tree Haubro et al [28] IPV6-based P 90% Tree Dias and Grilo [29] ad-hoc-based P 98% Flooding Abrardo and Pozzebon [30] ad-hoc-based P 95% Tree Ludell et al [31] ad-hoc-based Proof-ofconcept NS Flooding Anedda et al [32] ad-hoc-based S NS Tree Kim et al [33] ad-hoc-based Theorical analysis 90% Flooding Dwijaksara et al [34] ad-hoc-based S NS Flooding Lopez et al [25] ad-hoc-based S 86% Tree [8]. Therefore, SWG can not deal with most of routing protocols reviewed previously as sensor data nodes are involved in the routing process.…”
Section: Lorawan Multi-hop Sdn-based Solution For Smart Water Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy usage of the network consequently rises as its dependability falls. Although the LoRaWAN specification only stipulates a single-hop between end devices and the gateway [13], [14], [15], various studies have proposed multi-hop solutions for network extension or improvements [2], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], where some devices operate as relays, routers, or intermediate gateways. Most commonly, multi-hop communication is employed to increase battery life and network longevity by optimizing the wireless network energy consumption and increasing the coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research work has proposed multi-hop routing to address scalability, capacity, and reliability issues in LoRaWAN networks [31], [32]. The majority of recent research on multihop LoRaWAN has dealt with either real-life deployments of such networks or network models that include relay nodes or router nodes [2], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. In this article, we present a model to compare and contrast single-hop and multi-hop networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each end-device facing different interference, and some of them could transmit packet directly to the gateway using the best data rate. Although a packet duplication caused by unnecessary forwarding can increase reliability [ 6 , 7 ], it also reduces the availability of network resources that prevent transmission from the end-devices. For a massive IoT, this unnecessary forwarding can be a severe problem that decreases the overall reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%