Towards Empirically Measuring Patience

Brockhoff, Klaus; Margolin, Maximilian; Weber, Juergen

doi:10.13189/ujm.2015.030501

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consistent with past research (Brockhoff et al, 2015;Davis et al, 2007;Franken and Muris, 2005), the study identifies ten individual attributes that are common to leaders who practice patience in decision making. Although vast majority of existing literature characterize patience as the ability to endure waiting, this study coincides with Peterson and Seligman (2004) that personality traits are associated with the characterization of patience.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

The role of patience as a decision-making heuristic in leadership

Haque¹,

Liu

TitiAmayah

2017

QROM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to address the gap in the literature by providing a precise conceptualization of the concept of patience in the context of leadership. Design/methodology/approach The current study was conducted using a qualitative approach as it aimed to explore leaders’ perceptions and experiences with patience and eventually build a theoretical model in relation to the role of patience in leadership. Because the aim of the study was to obtain insight into the experiences of the participants in their own words, this study adopted a grounded theory research design. Findings The grounded theory study resulted in an emergent theoretical model for understanding the decision-making process of leaders who exhibit patience as a character strength and how those leaders promote organizational success. Through an inductive approach, this grounded theory study identified the behaviors that participating leaders viewed as patient, as well as the outcomes and the contextual conditions for the effectiveness of such behaviors. Research limitations/implications A major contribution of this study is that leaders epitomized by patience are guided by a decision-making framework that can contribute to more favorable decision making outcomes. Practical implications The proposed model for patience leadership has implications for developing the leadership capacity. Originality/value Patience, as a leadership quality, has been overlooked virtue in the social and psychological sciences. In order to explore the potential nexus between patience and leadership, the study has offered an emergent theoretical model and indicated the specific ways in which leaders may effectively practice patience.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 65%

The role of patience as a decision-making heuristic in leadership

Haque¹,

Liu

TitiAmayah

2017

QROM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the patience measuring instrument has a different internal consistency in the results of several previous researches. The recommendation for further research is to use a patience measuring instrument compiled by Brockhoff, K., Margolin, M., & Weber, J. (2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role Of Patience Disposition On The Effect Of Self-Efficacy On Academic Cheating

Rozi

2021

Psikis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to determine the role of the disposition of patience on the effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating. Participants involved in this study were 340 people with 38% women (mean age of all subjects = 19.3 and SD = 2.01). The measuring instrument used to measure the self-efficacy variable is the General Self Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995), the patience variable is measured by the First version of the Patience Scale (El Hafiz Lila, Rozi, Ilham, 2013), and the academic cheating variable is measured by the Academic Dishonesty Scale (Bashir & Bala, 2018). The statistical analysis used in this study is the moderating analysis of Process Hayes (2013) which provides an overview of the role of the disposition of patience on the effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating. The disposition of patience will strengthen the negative effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating. The results show that patience acts as a significant moderating variable on the effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating and the disposition of patience strengthens the negative effect between these variables. Where, the negative effect on the effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating depends on the disposition of the level of patience. The higher the disposition of patience, the higher the negative effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating.

show abstract

“…To this end, we offer our SCE-8 scale to researchers for any study in which the sunk cost effect may explain outcomes, reducing or eliminating the need to run a full experiment. Collecting SCE-8 data would allow subjects' susceptibility to the sunk cost effect to be measured and used in the same way as other common items including risk tolerance (Blais and Weber, 2006), patience levels (Brockhoff et al, 2015), and personality measures (Costa and McCrae, 1989).…”

Section: Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%