Towards Effective Design and Evaluation of Workplace Wellness Programs

Abstract

R® is a registered trademark Limited Print and Electronic Distribution RightsThis document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org iii AbstractIn an effort to reduce chronic disease burden on the workforce, both public and private initiatives have promoted the rapid expansion of workplace wellness programs to encourage healthy behavior. Despite enthusiasm about these programs, evidence for their effectiveness remains mixed. The major reasons postulated for these mixed results include low participation rates, heterogeneity in program design and non-existent or poorly designed evaluations. In this dissertation, I attempted to address the gaps in the research on program components, their interactions and provide a method for evidencebased evaluation.The first chapter focuses on incentives, which are often prescribed by guidance literature to increase participation. I examined the relationship of high-value and penalty-type incentives to participation rates in a nationwide sample of employers. Results suggested that increasing the value of an incentive may not yield much in terms of participation. Penalty-type incentives were associated with higher participation, but would require significant employee buy-in to implement.The second chapter examines the relationship between program design and employee engagement. Much of the guidance literature recommends adding more components to achieve higher outcomes. However, based on analysis of data from employers and employees, it appears that there are interactions between program components and employee engagement. A program with an average number of services available may be better served by increasing the number of opportunities for employees to participate rather than increasing the number of services.The final chapter synthesizes evidence from the other chapters, guidance from the literature and interviews with wellness program stakeholders in order to provide an evidence base for an interactive evaluation tool. This tool allows small-size employers or employers at the early stages of program implementation to in...