2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2022.103851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards ecosystem modeling in the deep sea: A review of past efforts and primer for the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See Supplementary Figs. [6][7][8][9][10][11] for details of the model robustness checks. We validated our model choice with the use of manual topic intrusion validation using the R package oolong 90 .…”
Section: Latent Dirichlet Analysis Topic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…See Supplementary Figs. [6][7][8][9][10][11] for details of the model robustness checks. We validated our model choice with the use of manual topic intrusion validation using the R package oolong 90 .…”
Section: Latent Dirichlet Analysis Topic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep-sea fishing programmes were run by South Africa and the former USSR in the 1970s and, more recently, by Iceland and Norway in the 2000s 5 . Scientific interest in the mesopelagic zone has grown rapidly in the 21st century 6,7 (see also Supplementary Fig. 1), largely funded by the European Union and United States 8,9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we review selected case studies where an Ecopath, Ecosim, or Ecospace (hereafter ‘EwE’) model has been developed within an operational context to inform fisheries or multi‐sector resource management. Prior reviews of EwE models have focused on use of the model over decadal time scales (Colléter et al, 2015), applications in ecosystems of particular interest (Coll & Libralato, 2012; Woodstock & Zhang, 2022), technical aspects of the model (Plagányi & Butterworth, 2004), applications to particular species groups (e.g., predatory fishes, Christensen et al, 2003; jellyfishes, Lamb et al, 2019; forage fishes, Pikitch et al, 2014), and the development of management‐relevant outputs (Heymans et al, 2014). The advantages and limitations of EwE as an operational tool to support fisheries and multi‐sector resource management have rarely been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%