2017
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amw051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Ecological Validity in Research into Input-based Practice: Form Spotting Can Be as Beneficial as Form-meaning Practice

Abstract: This study extends previous input-based grammar instruction research (for reviews, DeKeyser and Prieto Botana 2015; Shintani 2015) by comparing two types of input-based practice, each with the same explicit information, for learning L2 German definite article case-marking cues (der, den). Participants (N=138, aged nine to 11) received explicit information followed by either task-essential practice in making form-meaning connections (referential activities from Processing Instruction) OR task-essential practice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(91 reference statements)
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We should also note a potential lack of ecological validity in using an activity that resulted in such low levels of comprehension. However, of interest are findings from Marsden and colleagues’ studies, where word‐ and sentence‐level tasks that are more ecologically valid to L2 pedagogy were processed in such a way that participants (a) successfully attended to the form of an article and the meaning of a sentence (Kasprowicz & Marsden, ) and (b) showed their ability to learn the meaning of a word even while their attention was oriented to the meaning of a form (Marsden et al., , Experiment 3). Thus, there seem to be conditions where learners can successfully attend to both L2 form and meaning, and perhaps one of the roles of L2 instruction is to create these conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should also note a potential lack of ecological validity in using an activity that resulted in such low levels of comprehension. However, of interest are findings from Marsden and colleagues’ studies, where word‐ and sentence‐level tasks that are more ecologically valid to L2 pedagogy were processed in such a way that participants (a) successfully attended to the form of an article and the meaning of a sentence (Kasprowicz & Marsden, ) and (b) showed their ability to learn the meaning of a word even while their attention was oriented to the meaning of a form (Marsden et al., , Experiment 3). Thus, there seem to be conditions where learners can successfully attend to both L2 form and meaning, and perhaps one of the roles of L2 instruction is to create these conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, it is also possible that, for (at least some of) the young learners in the present study, the intervention may have been too brief, as explicit learning by young learners is slower than for more cognitively mature, older learners (Lichtman, ). Indeed, Kasprowicz and Marsden () observed substantial learning gains following form–meaning mapping practice for 9‐ to 11‐year olds, but after a longer (250 minutes) intervention over 5 weeks, which focussed on one grammatical function (subject or object assignment via German definite articles).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learners ( n = 22) of equivalent age and language experience to the main study participants piloted the tests to check the comprehensibility of the instructions, test format, and picture stimuli. Similar tests have been utilized in previous studies with participants of a similar age (e.g., sentence–picture matching task test, Kasprowicz & Marsden, ; AJT, Marsden & Chen, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that PI training may need to be reinforced through longer treatments or repeated training. This is especially true in classroom settings, where learners’ input generally lacks OVS sentences, an issue that is likely exacerbated when overall exposure to the target language is more limited (see Kasprowicz & Marsden, , for further discussion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%