2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2016.7842341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Distributed Service Allocation in Fog-to-Cloud (F2C) Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mahmud et al also considered a general resource value, but they additionally defined the service demand and device capacity in terms of the expected and offered processing times. On the contrary, this model was sometimes simplified to a scalar value that represents a general capacity unit or with general resources slots . Finally, some other papers defined the hardware resources of the fog computing nodes, but they did not include this constraint in the optimization process to simplify it …”
Section: Analysis Of the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mahmud et al also considered a general resource value, but they additionally defined the service demand and device capacity in terms of the expected and offered processing times. On the contrary, this model was sometimes simplified to a scalar value that represents a general capacity unit or with general resources slots . Finally, some other papers defined the hardware resources of the fog computing nodes, but they did not include this constraint in the optimization process to simplify it …”
Section: Analysis Of the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic programming Differently from the others, Souza et al 59 modeled FAPP as a 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem 80 with the objective of minimizing a given objective function. Limited simulation results on a medium-sized example (40 application components, six fog nodes, and three clouds) are provided by the authors.…”
Section: Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to offloading user storage and processing tasks to the edge, offloading cloud tasks has been a trend . Souza et al introduced a service distribution strategy among the cloud and fogs, which achieves low delay for service allocation. The work aims at atomizing (ie, breaking down) cloud services into smaller subservices and then executing them on edge devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the collaboration between cloud and fog computing, Alsaffar et al 23 present an architecture of IoT service delegation and resource allocation, in which user requests can be efficiently managed and delegated to appropriate cloud or fog based on linearized decision tree which considers tree conditions (service size, completion time, and VM capacity). Souza and collegues 24,25 address QoS-aware service allocation problem in a combined cloud-fog architecture consisting a duallayer fog aiming to diminish the cloud access delay in IoT scenarios. Meanwhile, Deng et al 7 investigate the tradeoff between power consumption and delay in a cloud-fog computing system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%