2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards developing a backing layer for proton exchange membrane electrolyzers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
128
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
128
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements reveal that the contact between the carbon BPP on the cathode side and the the respective CD accounts for the highest share. Somewhat surprisingly, the cell under investigation here does not show a significant contribution of the anodic PTL (Ti felt) as found by other studies [45]. The reason may be the incorporated Ir metal layer between the CL and the PTL on the anode, which is a relatively unique feature.…”
Section: Contact Resistancessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The measurements reveal that the contact between the carbon BPP on the cathode side and the the respective CD accounts for the highest share. Somewhat surprisingly, the cell under investigation here does not show a significant contribution of the anodic PTL (Ti felt) as found by other studies [45]. The reason may be the incorporated Ir metal layer between the CL and the PTL on the anode, which is a relatively unique feature.…”
Section: Contact Resistancessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These findings in the combination with the fact that an increase in -Z im are observed at the highest frequencies in all the Nyquist plots, cause us to suggest that a third suppressed arc independent on current density is partly observed at the highest frequencies probably originating from current constrictions as described by Fleig et al 27 Lettenmeier et al 6 observed the same trend with a very high frequency EIS arc independent on current density. Porous nature of the anode or areas with extended electrolyte-electrode contact, causing two-phase boundaries instead of triple phase boundaries in the anode material, may prevent the proton conduction in parts of the electrolyte surface increasing the resistance of the electrolyte.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] However, some research groups such as Rozain et al, 13,14 Lettenmeier et al 15 and Siracusano et al 5,16 among others have studied EIS of PEMECs in further detail, but most often at low current densities in the activation region of the iV-curve, where the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) current density is very low. [5][6][7][8]13,14,16,17 Only a few research groups have reported EIS measured at higher current densities in the linear region of the iV-curve during the OER. [6][7][8] The EIS data is often fitted to an empirical equivalent circuit consisting of a serial resistance and one or two arcs reported to originate from the anode, or from the cathode and the anode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the differences in HFR cannot be explained by the PTL bulk properties, it is hypothesized that the different SSD results in different interfacial contact resistances (ICRs) between PTLs and CLs. ICRs may be quantified using ex situ methods, 37 as demonstrated for PEWE PTLs by Lettenmeier et al 38 who reported a reduction in the ICR of about 20 m · cm 2 when adding a microporous layer (MPL) to the PTL (also T10).…”
Section: Overpotential Analysis-the Cell Voltage Is Composed Of the mentioning
confidence: 99%