2019
DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v13i04.10547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Designing Tools for Universities’ R&D Performance Measurement on Mobile Platform

Abstract: <p class="Abstract">At the moment, there is a great interest in most universities to achieve higher ranking for better international standings and visibility. With shrinking resources such as financial and infrastructures, there is also a huge demand for the university to move forward and perform better in Research and Development (R&amp;D) in each evaluation year. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) is an excellent tool to enculturate research in a Higher Education Institution (HEI). The culture must be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, some researchers have warned of the risk of dependence on one metric and the use of multiple metrics is recommended to reduce the risk of bias 5 and to achieve a high degree of precision in journal and researchers' evaluation and assessments 6 . Another use can be seen in research output evaluation [7][8][9] , journal auditing [10][11][12][13] and university rankings [14][15][16] . The issue of transparency, coverage, computational accuracy, integrity and reliability of the metrics are constantly being debated especially, for journal impact factor [17][18][19][20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, some researchers have warned of the risk of dependence on one metric and the use of multiple metrics is recommended to reduce the risk of bias 5 and to achieve a high degree of precision in journal and researchers' evaluation and assessments 6 . Another use can be seen in research output evaluation [7][8][9] , journal auditing [10][11][12][13] and university rankings [14][15][16] . The issue of transparency, coverage, computational accuracy, integrity and reliability of the metrics are constantly being debated especially, for journal impact factor [17][18][19][20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%