2016
DOI: 10.1080/07256868.2016.1190697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Decolonising Teacher Education: Criticality, Relationality and Intercultural Understanding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the heart of education is the relationship between students and their lecturers and this relationship could have decolonising potential (Martin and Pirbhai-Illich 2016). The relationship between lecturers and students was affected by the protest movement in different ways.…”
Section: Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the heart of education is the relationship between students and their lecturers and this relationship could have decolonising potential (Martin and Pirbhai-Illich 2016). The relationship between lecturers and students was affected by the protest movement in different ways.…”
Section: Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CR perspective we adopted is rooted in various works such as critical race theory, decolonizing and de/postcolonial views, and methodology/pedagogy of the oppressed. Criticality and relationality are approached in these contexts as two parts of a whole (Martin & Pirbhai-Illich, 2016). Criticality as applied to education and learning systems is the momentum of interrogation and questioning in an area of thought, while relationality offers a social and cultural lens through with to describe the connections between learners and the world they are a part of.…”
Section: Critical Relationalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from these and other studies raise important questions about how PSTs from the global North can engage ethically and fruitfully with less advantaged communities. One significant determining factor posited by Martin (2012) and Martin and Pirbhai-Illich (2016), is the nature of PSTs' epistemological framing of the 'other'; whether object-based or relational, and the presence or absence of reflexive, critical questioning of this framing and its accompanying assumptions. Herein lies a challenge, since epistemological beliefs can be stubbornly difficult to shift.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether these shifts represent the sort of epistemological transformation that Martin (2012) and Martin and Pirbhai-Illich (2016) deem necessary is harder to discern. Whilst participants demonstrated degrees of critical self-awareness and a determination to make sense of encounters through relationship, their discourse, on-the-whole, remained seasoned with object-based vocabulary, even after their visit ('I think I was expecting it to be a lot more poor.…”
Section: Implications For Psts and Their Future Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation