Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/etfa46521.2020.9212040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards compositional automated planning

Abstract: The development of efficient propositional satisfiability problem solving algorithms (SAT solvers) in the past two decades has made automated planning using SAT-solvers an established AI planning approach. Modern SAT solvers can accommodate a wide variety of planning problems with a large number of variables. However, fast computing of reasonably long plans proves challenging for planning as satisfiability. In order to address this challenge, we present a compositional approach based on abstraction refinement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably one of the biggest contributors to speed in planning as satisfiability is parallel planning and it is presented in detail in [20]. Moreover, there is compositional planning as investigated in [21], and hierarchical planning [22]. Big performance improvements in planning as satisfiability can be unlocked when methods are altered on the low, SAT solving level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably one of the biggest contributors to speed in planning as satisfiability is parallel planning and it is presented in detail in [20]. Moreover, there is compositional planning as investigated in [21], and hierarchical planning [22]. Big performance improvements in planning as satisfiability can be unlocked when methods are altered on the low, SAT solving level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%