Towards building internal social network architecture that drives innovation: a social exchange theory perspective

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to contribute toward the extension and further development of the social exchange theory. It provides conceptual insights on social networks in geographically dispersed organizations, and how intra-organizational social interactions influence organizational behavior, employees relationship exchange inclination and innovation drive. Design/methodology/approach A thematic literature review method was used to conduct an extensive review of relevant literature. Findings Guided by the tenets of the social exchange theory, the authors’ analysis and discussions elucidate how intra-organizational social network architecture can be developed, supported and utilized to drive innovations in geographically dispersed organizations. Research limitations/implications A general limitation and perhaps also a strength of this type of conceptual paper is that it is a synthesis (thematic discursive analysis) of existing theory and published research. Thus, there are no primary empirical content. However, the issue of empirical evidence is nevertheless mediated by the fact that the discussions and argumentation process generate key propositions which could be validated in subsequent research endeavors. Also, the selection of relevant literature is restricted specifically to the topic of the study. The authors strived to ensure rigor through a robust and comprehensive literature review which was organized thematically according to all the key words in the main and sub-topics covered in Section 2. Practical implications The insights presented suggest that management should pay serious attention to organizational design – that is, not only from the conventional contractual obligations point of view, but rather, the increasing importance of social capital should also be given some priority when thinking of resilient ways to encourage collaborations and efficient knowledge management. In other words, intra-organizational social network architecture should be considered as organizational capability and utilized as a toolset for the SIHRM to harness knowledge flow and unleash innovation. Social implications As both bonding and bridging ties are not only critical for success of project teams but also intensify knowledge symmetry across different units of the organization, they are a major conduit for sustainable open innovation culture within organization. To develop competitive capabilities throughout the organization, it is important for the SIHRM to be involved in global networking, and as a network leader, the human resource management function must have an awareness of leading trends and developments in social networking. The ability to mobilize the appropriate resources and a sense of timing and context in implementing such architecture within the geographically spread organization is crucial. Originality/value The novel contribution of this paper is twofold. First, the study provides an implementable framework which scholars and practitioners could use to develop and test the actualization of an intra-organizational social network architecture in a geographically dispersed organization. Second, the study has provided some key propositions and a well-grounded direction for further research to inspire further development/extension of the social exchange theory.

Examining the Influence of Human Capital on Employees’ Innovative Work Behaviour: A Moderated Serial Mediation Model

“…if a party receives unfavourable treatment, they would respond to the offering party in a similar manner (Huang et al, 2016). A stream of research suggests that social exchange norms guide various intra-organisational relationships (Oparaocha, 2016). Arguing on similar lines, we posit that HR practices enhance an employee’s KSAOs shape organisational transactions and resource exchanges in a manner that it causes reciprocal obligations of positive quality.…”

Understanding the Double-Level Influence of Guanxi on Construction Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Knowledge Sharing and the Cross-Level Moderating Role of Inter-Organizational Relationships

“…Social exchange theory postulates that all social behaviours result from an exchange process [39], and an important assumption of the theory is that the behaviours are based on reciprocal exchanges [40,41]. In essence, social exchange theory is one of the most influential conceptual paradigms applied to understanding workplace behaviour [42], exchange rules and norms that shape social behaviours, and resource exchanges [43].…”

The rebranding of Srichand: Transforming a 70‐year‐old small and medium enterprise into a disruptive global player

“…The top management team at Srichand acts as a center of dynamic marketing capabilities, where employees can acquire knowledge not only from them, but also from their associated networks. This helps build inter‐organizational knowledge (Kohlbacher, ; Oparaocha, ). Information gleaned from the following networks proved essential to Srichand's rebranding and organizational transformation. CEO's contacts — A well‐known businessperson and speaker in Thailand, Hanutsaha shares his knowledge about the external environment with employees via various communication platforms and during meetings.…”