2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-02165-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards bridging the neuro-symbolic gap: deep deductive reasoners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example for a currently emerging line of research compatible with the thoughts just laid out, is that of so-called deep deductive reasoners [57], which are deep learning systems trained to perform deductive reasoning over formal logics. The deductive reasoning task can be framed as classification (a statement is or is not a logical consequence of a given theory) or as regression (produce all logical consequences under some finiteness constraints).…”
Section: Paths Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example for a currently emerging line of research compatible with the thoughts just laid out, is that of so-called deep deductive reasoners [57], which are deep learning systems trained to perform deductive reasoning over formal logics. The deductive reasoning task can be framed as classification (a statement is or is not a logical consequence of a given theory) or as regression (produce all logical consequences under some finiteness constraints).…”
Section: Paths Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the point of view of evaluating a neuro-symbolic reasoning procedure, the key aspects [22], in addition to the previously discussed conventional reasoning evaluation measures, are as follows.…”
Section: Conventional Reasoning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early days, the research on construction language mainly focused on its concept and theoretical connotation. For example, Ebrahimi et al used construction grammar theory to examine their research's linguistic and constructional meanings [9]. Kekki and Ivaska explored the relationship between constructional structure and its syntactic representation [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%