2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards better flood risk management: Assessing flood risk and investigating the potential mechanism based on machine learning models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the inputs used for flood susceptibility, such as elevation and land use, flood risk mapping may require also other inputs such as population density, spatial estimates of economic value, and building types. Up to now, only Chen et al (2021) combined DL and flood risk assessment. They showed that ML and DL approaches can estimate flood risk at regional scale, but do not compare their results against other methods, such as MCDA.…”
Section: Flood Applications and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the inputs used for flood susceptibility, such as elevation and land use, flood risk mapping may require also other inputs such as population density, spatial estimates of economic value, and building types. Up to now, only Chen et al (2021) combined DL and flood risk assessment. They showed that ML and DL approaches can estimate flood risk at regional scale, but do not compare their results against other methods, such as MCDA.…”
Section: Flood Applications and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a previous literature review, there are many indices used for disaster risk assessment. Most studies have identified that the risk is caused by the interaction of different factors, including disaster-causing factors (hazard), the disaster formative environment (sensitivity), and disaster bearers (vulnerability) [18,29,41]. Thus, the framework of the index system was established from the three aspects, hazard, sensitivity, and vulnerability (Figure 2).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flood risk assessment and mapping is a crucial part of flood risk management, aiming to identify the location, magnitude, and distribution of risk areas under intense rainfall to provide key information for future urban planning and disaster mitigation [21,22]. At present, there are many kinds of methods for flood risk assessment, including hydrologic and hydraulic models [23,24], historical disaster mathematical statistics analysis [15,25], geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing (RS) coupling analysis [26], scenario simulation analysis [27,28], machine learning models (MLMs) [29,30], and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) [26,31,32]. Among these methods, historical disaster analysis is easy to implement based on the statistics of historical disasters, and its assessment results are generally consistent with reality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GBDT improves the capacity of the decision tree by reducing the residuals generated during the training procedure [22,23]. It has been widely applied in social science research [24][25][26][27][28] and gradually introduced into the field of natural science [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The GBDT exhibits much better performance in the retrieval of water depth compared with the single-band, dual-band, and BP neural network models [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%