2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/focs46700.2020.00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Better Approximation of Graph Crossing Number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we pose a problem about using MultiInsertion to approximate the tanglegram crossing number, where the bound is modeled after one in [4]. For any tanglegram (T, S, φ), this also requires finding a planar subtanglegram (T I , S φ(I) , φ| I ), and from Corollary 4.18, we know that we do not necessarily want a subtanglegram of maximum size.…”
Section: Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we pose a problem about using MultiInsertion to approximate the tanglegram crossing number, where the bound is modeled after one in [4]. For any tanglegram (T, S, φ), this also requires finding a planar subtanglegram (T I , S φ(I) , φ| I ), and from Corollary 4.18, we know that we do not necessarily want a subtanglegram of maximum size.…”
Section: Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , e n } optimally, and current approximation algorithms for graph drawings still use multiple edge insertion with planar subgraphs [4]. Given the role that edge insertion with planar subgraphs plays in graph drawings, it is plausible that edge insertion can play a similar role for tanglegram layouts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the above results follow the same high-level algorithmic framework, and it was shown by Chuzhoy, Madan and Mahabadi [CMM16] (see [Chu16] for an exposition) that this framework is unlikely to yield a better than O( √ n)-approximation. The most recent result, by Chuzhoy, Mahabadi and Tan [CMT20], obtained an Õ(n 1/2− • poly(∆))-approximation algorithm for some small fixed constant > 0. This result was achieved by proposing a new algorithmic framework for the problem, that departs from the previous approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was achieved by proposing a new algorithmic framework for the problem, that departs from the previous approach. Specifically, [CMT20] reduced the MCN problem to another problem, called Minimum Crossing Number with Rotation System (MCNwRS) that we discuss below, which appears somewhat easier than the MCN problem, and then provided an algorithm for approximately solving the MCNwRS problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation