2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2008.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards automated progress assessment of workpackage components in construction projects using computer vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rankohi & Waugh (2014) give an overview and comparison of image-based approaches for the monitoring of construction progress. In [11] a single camera approach is used and images taken are compared over a certain period and rasterized. The change between two timeframes is detected through a spatial-temporal derivative filter.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rankohi & Waugh (2014) give an overview and comparison of image-based approaches for the monitoring of construction progress. In [11] a single camera approach is used and images taken are compared over a certain period and rasterized. The change between two timeframes is detected through a spatial-temporal derivative filter.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview and comparison of image-based approaches for construction progress monitoring is given by (Rankohi and Waugh, 2014). (Ibrahim et al, 2009) introduce an approach with a single, fixed camera. They analyze the changes of consecutive images acquired every 15 minutes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asbuilt information is provided by laser scanning point clouds (BoschĂ©, 2010, Turkan et al, 2012, Kim et al, 2013b, Maalek et al, 2015, images of fixed cameras (Lukins and Trucco, 2007, Ibrahim et al, 2009, Kim et al, 2013a and photogrammetric point clouds (Golparvar-Fard et al, 2012, Golparvar-Fard et al, 2011. There are several additional works related to the approach of (GolparvarFard et al, 2012) (e.g., (Karsch et al, 2014, Ham et al, 2016), but to the knowledge of the authors this is the only group working on construction site monitoring using photogrammetric point clouds.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation of 3D point clouds from fixed cameras would require a very large number of devices to cover the whole construction site. Instead, they can be used for construction site monitoring using image processing and comparison with a projected as-planned model, as done for example by (Lukins and Trucco, 2007, Ibrahim et al, 2009, Kim et al, 2013a. Table 1.…”
Section: Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%