2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20712-9_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Approximate Matching in Compressed Strings: Local Subsequence Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has also been a significant amount of recent research effort on developing string processing algorithms that operate directly on grammar-compressed data -i.e., without prior decompression. To date this work includes algorithms for computing subword complexity [3,19], online subsequence matching and approximate matching [4,47], faster edit distance computation [17,22], and computation of various kinds of biologically relevant repetitions [1,27,24,25]. We will often use a DAG (directed acyclic graph) representation of the grammar with one source (corresponding to the unique non-terminal that generates the whole string) and σ sinks (corresponding to the terminals).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been a significant amount of recent research effort on developing string processing algorithms that operate directly on grammar-compressed data -i.e., without prior decompression. To date this work includes algorithms for computing subword complexity [3,19], online subsequence matching and approximate matching [4,47], faster edit distance computation [17,22], and computation of various kinds of biologically relevant repetitions [1,27,24,25]. We will often use a DAG (directed acyclic graph) representation of the grammar with one source (corresponding to the unique non-terminal that generates the whole string) and σ sinks (corresponding to the terminals).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We presented a number of such algorithmic applications in [41,42,[61][62][63]65], and two biological applications in [7,52]. Our new distance multiplication algorithm implies immediate improvements in running time for a number of string comparison and graph algorithms: semi-local longest common subsequences between permutations; longest increasing subsequence in a cyclic permutation; maximum clique in a circle graph; longest common subsequence between a grammar-compressed string and an uncompressed string.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They presented O(nm 2 log m) time algorithms for solving the problems for an SLP of size n and subsequence pattern of length m. Later, an improved algorithm running in time O(nm 1.5 ) was presented by Tiskin [14]. Later, Tiskin improved the running time to O(nm log m) [15]. In this paper, we further reduce the time complexities to O(nm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%