2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40462-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Understanding of the Neural Basis of Acoustic Communication in Crickets

Abstract: Their conspicuous acoustic communication behaviour makes crickets excellent model systems to study the neural mechanisms underlying signal generation and auditory pattern recognition. Male singing is driven by a central pattern generator (CPG) housed in the metathoracic and anterior abdominal ganglia with rhythmically active opener and closer interneurons that can reset the chirp rhythm. Command neurons descending from the brain control the singing behaviour. Female phonotaxis is tuned towards the species-spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the carrier frequency of field cricket calling songs are generally similar, the temporal patterning of sound pulses is species-specific (Gerhardt and Huber, 2002). In addition to differences in pulse rates, cricket songs also differ in the fine scale temporal structure of sound pulses (i.e., pulse durations and the interval between pulses) and larger scale temporal organization of sound pulses into chirps and gaps between and within trills (Hedwig, 2014). In the current experiments, we examined pulse rate preferences in test songs by manipulating pulse durations and intervals by equal amounts to maintain a 50% duty cycle.…”
Section: Developing a Phonotaxis Performance Index To Capture Signal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the carrier frequency of field cricket calling songs are generally similar, the temporal patterning of sound pulses is species-specific (Gerhardt and Huber, 2002). In addition to differences in pulse rates, cricket songs also differ in the fine scale temporal structure of sound pulses (i.e., pulse durations and the interval between pulses) and larger scale temporal organization of sound pulses into chirps and gaps between and within trills (Hedwig, 2014). In the current experiments, we examined pulse rate preferences in test songs by manipulating pulse durations and intervals by equal amounts to maintain a 50% duty cycle.…”
Section: Developing a Phonotaxis Performance Index To Capture Signal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, we have not been able to pin cricket song rhythm variation down to individual genes. However, the neurobiology of the cricket song generation is generally well understood, involving contributions from descending brain neurons, specialized motor neurons in the thorax called central pattern generators, and related neuromuscular modulators such as ion channels and synaptic targets [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. Therefore, other organisms with known genetic and neurological pathways that drive sex-specific and (acoustic) courtship behaviors can shed light on the potential mechanisms at play in Laupala song divergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a proximate level, whether crickets call or not is controlled in the brain [5], which activates a central pattern generator distributed along thoracic [6] and abdominal [7] ganglia, which in turn control the rhythmic movements of the forewings and determine the temporal structure of the call [8]. A single pulse of sound is produced on the closing wingstroke, a silent inter-pulse interval on the opening wingstroke; series of pulses are called chirps or trills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%