2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an understanding of retouch flakes: A use-wear blind test on knapped stone microdebitage

Abstract: The retouching and resharpening of lithic tools during their production and maintenance leads to the production of large numbers of small flakes and chips known as microdebitage. Standard analytical approaches to this material involves the mapping of microartefact densities to identify activity areas, and the creation of techno-typologies to characterise the form of retouch flakes from different types of tools. Whilst use-wear analysis is a common approach to the analysis of tools, it has been applied much les… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is achieved by systematically scanning the edges and surfaces of stone tools under different magnifications ranging between 0.63 X to 500x and plotting their location and distribution. The location and morphology of specific micro negatives, edge rounding, microscopic polish, micro scars and striations are compared to an experimental reference collection in order to establish the kinetics of stone tool use as well as the material transformed (Chan et al, 2020;González-Urquijo and Ibañez-Estéves, 1994;Keeley, 1980;Vaughan, 1985). For this study a Carl Zeiss Stemi 508 stereo microscope and an Olympus reflected light microscope have been used.…”
Section: Take Down Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved by systematically scanning the edges and surfaces of stone tools under different magnifications ranging between 0.63 X to 500x and plotting their location and distribution. The location and morphology of specific micro negatives, edge rounding, microscopic polish, micro scars and striations are compared to an experimental reference collection in order to establish the kinetics of stone tool use as well as the material transformed (Chan et al, 2020;González-Urquijo and Ibañez-Estéves, 1994;Keeley, 1980;Vaughan, 1985). For this study a Carl Zeiss Stemi 508 stereo microscope and an Olympus reflected light microscope have been used.…”
Section: Take Down Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resharpening was confirmed by one microflake bearing traces of butchering (ID 21020) (Fig. 18a; see also Chan et al, 2020 for a discussion of the use-wear observables on micro-debitage). Resharpening was suggested in two other cases: a retouched flake (ID 20825) Fig.…”
Section: Use-wear Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This question of probability and its associated uncertainty is rarely acknowledged in the literature presenting the results of traceological studies. Also, a certain number of questions, already raised in the 1980s, related to the reliability and reproducibility of the method in particular, are still relevant today 2 8 . This is why the development and/or application of quantitative methods, which would complement the still fundamental qualitative approach, are essential for the future of the discipline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%