2013
DOI: 10.2478/msr-2013-0049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Optimal Interest Point Detector for Measurements in Ultrasound Images

Abstract: This paper focuses on the comparison of different interest point detectors and their utilization for measurements in ultrasound (US) images. Certain medical examinations are based on speckle tracking which strongly relies on features that can be reliably tracked frame to frame. Only significant features (interest points) resistant to noise and brightness changes within US images are suitable for accurate long-lasting tracking. We compare three interest point detectors -Harris-Laplace, Difference of Gaussian (D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second network (Fig. 2d) was pre-trained on two public US image datasets 63,64 and fine-tuned on previously acquired transverse 2D US images of peripheral upper-extremity vessels from nine subjects using two clinical US transducers (L18-10L30H-4, Telemed Ultrasound and SeeMore Near-Field 7.5/24 MHz, Interson) 59 . Inputs were two-channel tensors with dimensions 512 × 416 × 2 containing B-mode and CDIs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second network (Fig. 2d) was pre-trained on two public US image datasets 63,64 and fine-tuned on previously acquired transverse 2D US images of peripheral upper-extremity vessels from nine subjects using two clinical US transducers (L18-10L30H-4, Telemed Ultrasound and SeeMore Near-Field 7.5/24 MHz, Interson) 59 . Inputs were two-channel tensors with dimensions 512 × 416 × 2 containing B-mode and CDIs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%